diff for duplicates of <1527894285.13403.43.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 96e711c..f58fe71 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > Kees? > > -> > Commit 6593d92 ("firmware_class: perform new LSM checks") references -> > two methods of loading firmware - filesystem-found firmware and -> > demand-loaded blobs. I assume this call in firmware_loading_store() -> > is the demand-loaded blobs. Does that method still exist? Is it +> > Commit 6593d92 ("firmware_class: perform new LSM checks") references +> > two methods of loading firmware - filesystem-found firmware and +> > demand-loaded blobs. I assume this call in firmware_loading_store() +> > is the demand-loaded blobs. Does that method still exist? Is it > > still being used? > > Yeah its the stupid sysfs interface. So likely loadpin needs porting @@ -24,11 +24,5 @@ On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: In this case, it doesn't look like the call to security_kernel_post_read_file() should be changed, which means that all the LSMs and IMA still need to support !file. - + Mimi - - -_______________________________________________ -kexec mailing list -kexec@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 99f802d..7338482 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -7,16 +7,16 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] ima: based on policy require signed firmware (sysfs fallback)\0" "Date\0Fri, 01 Jun 2018 19:04:45 -0400\0" "To\0Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>" - Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - kexec@lists.infradead.org + "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" + linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org - " Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>\0" + kexec@lists.infradead.org + Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com> + Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> + " Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:\n" @@ -33,10 +33,10 @@ "> > > \n" "> > > Kees?\n" "> > \n" - "> > Commit\302\2406593d92 (\"firmware_class: perform new LSM checks\") references\n" - "> > two methods of loading firmware -\302\240\302\240filesystem-found firmware and\n" - "> > demand-loaded blobs. \302\240I assume this call in firmware_loading_store()\n" - "> > is the demand-loaded blobs. \302\240Does that method still exist? \302\240Is it\n" + "> > Commit 6593d92 (\"firmware_class: perform new LSM checks\") references\n" + "> > two methods of loading firmware - filesystem-found firmware and\n" + "> > demand-loaded blobs. I assume this call in firmware_loading_store()\n" + "> > is the demand-loaded blobs. Does that method still exist? Is it\n" "> > still being used?\n" "> \n" "> Yeah its the stupid sysfs interface. So likely loadpin needs porting\n" @@ -45,13 +45,7 @@ "In this case, it doesn't look like the call to\n" "security_kernel_post_read_file() should be changed, which means that\n" "all the LSMs and IMA still need to support !file.\n" - "\302\240\n" - "Mimi\n" - "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "kexec mailing list\n" - "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec + " \n" + Mimi -ecba6b9af50950df33af77f039ca3be41734e63ecc10d48efb430c68b9a5f67e +4b6c959a604558090d172d21f5ad82b2f7c6aad9ff3ece819690c7ccf3f9d97a
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 96e711c..66bff88 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -12,10 +12,10 @@ On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > > > > Kees? > > -> > Commit 6593d92 ("firmware_class: perform new LSM checks") references -> > two methods of loading firmware - filesystem-found firmware and -> > demand-loaded blobs. I assume this call in firmware_loading_store() -> > is the demand-loaded blobs. Does that method still exist? Is it +> > Commit?6593d92 ("firmware_class: perform new LSM checks") references +> > two methods of loading firmware -??filesystem-found firmware and +> > demand-loaded blobs. ?I assume this call in firmware_loading_store() +> > is the demand-loaded blobs. ?Does that method still exist? ?Is it > > still being used? > > Yeah its the stupid sysfs interface. So likely loadpin needs porting @@ -24,11 +24,10 @@ On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: In this case, it doesn't look like the call to security_kernel_post_read_file() should be changed, which means that all the LSMs and IMA still need to support !file. - +? Mimi - -_______________________________________________ -kexec mailing list -kexec@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in +the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 99f802d..a9764b8 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -3,20 +3,10 @@ "ref\020180601182107.GO4511@wotan.suse.de\0" "ref\01527892795.13403.26.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "ref\020180601224617.GU4511@wotan.suse.de\0" - "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] ima: based on policy require signed firmware (sysfs fallback)\0" + "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v4 5/8] ima: based on policy require signed firmware (sysfs fallback)\0" "Date\0Fri, 01 Jun 2018 19:04:45 -0400\0" - "To\0Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>" - Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - kexec@lists.infradead.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> - David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org - Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org - " Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>\0" + "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:\n" @@ -33,10 +23,10 @@ "> > > \n" "> > > Kees?\n" "> > \n" - "> > Commit\302\2406593d92 (\"firmware_class: perform new LSM checks\") references\n" - "> > two methods of loading firmware -\302\240\302\240filesystem-found firmware and\n" - "> > demand-loaded blobs. \302\240I assume this call in firmware_loading_store()\n" - "> > is the demand-loaded blobs. \302\240Does that method still exist? \302\240Is it\n" + "> > Commit?6593d92 (\"firmware_class: perform new LSM checks\") references\n" + "> > two methods of loading firmware -??filesystem-found firmware and\n" + "> > demand-loaded blobs. ?I assume this call in firmware_loading_store()\n" + "> > is the demand-loaded blobs. ?Does that method still exist? ?Is it\n" "> > still being used?\n" "> \n" "> Yeah its the stupid sysfs interface. So likely loadpin needs porting\n" @@ -45,13 +35,12 @@ "In this case, it doesn't look like the call to\n" "security_kernel_post_read_file() should be changed, which means that\n" "all the LSMs and IMA still need to support !file.\n" - "\302\240\n" + "?\n" "Mimi\n" "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "kexec mailing list\n" - "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -ecba6b9af50950df33af77f039ca3be41734e63ecc10d48efb430c68b9a5f67e +f8f8351194e7310bb1b23f5b87ee25a343d9d27ac2f2bb20f254c69f760f373f
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index 96e711c..ab494bd 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -26,9 +26,3 @@ security_kernel_post_read_file() should be changed, which means that all the LSMs and IMA still need to support !file. Mimi - - -_______________________________________________ -kexec mailing list -kexec@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 99f802d..0cb8a8b 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -7,16 +7,16 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] ima: based on policy require signed firmware (sysfs fallback)\0" "Date\0Fri, 01 Jun 2018 19:04:45 -0400\0" "To\0Luis R. Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org>\0" - "Cc\0Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>" - Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - kexec@lists.infradead.org + "Cc\0linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" + linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org - " Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>\0" + kexec@lists.infradead.org + Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com> + Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> + " Matthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 00:46 +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:\n" @@ -46,12 +46,6 @@ "security_kernel_post_read_file() should be changed, which means that\n" "all the LSMs and IMA still need to support !file.\n" "\302\240\n" - "Mimi\n" - "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "kexec mailing list\n" - "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec + Mimi -ecba6b9af50950df33af77f039ca3be41734e63ecc10d48efb430c68b9a5f67e +94d115afadfd055fddcba987700b74f81366bdc7445dac83ac69c01aea26c8e5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.