diff for duplicates of <1528142020.3237.138.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e01db16..2362377 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -17,23 +17,23 @@ On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 14:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > hook, is left to the security community. > > > > Paul does not have a preference as to adding a new LSM hook or calling -> > the existing hook. Either way is fine, as long as both the new and +> > the existing hook. Either way is fine, as long as both the new and > > existing hooks call the existing function. > > > > Casey didn't like the idea of a wrapper. > > James suggested renaming the LSM hook. > > > > The maintainers for the callers of the LSM hook prefer a meaningful -> > LSM hook name. The "null" argument is not as much of a concern. Only +> > LSM hook name. The "null" argument is not as much of a concern. Only > > Eric seems to be asking for a separate, new LSM hook, without the > > "null" argument. > > > > Unless someone really objects, to accommodate Eric we'll define a new -> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. Eric, are you planning on +> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. Eric, are you planning on > > I'm confused - isn't that what this patchset did? :) -Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. +Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. > > > Ack'ing patches 1 & 2? @@ -43,10 +43,4 @@ Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -> - - -_______________________________________________ -kexec mailing list -kexec@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec +> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 7a50fb4..a512e61 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -5,21 +5,21 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] kexec/firmware: support system wide policy requiring signatures\0" "Date\0Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:53:40 -0400\0" "To\0Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>\0" - "Cc\0Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>" - Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + "Cc\0Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>" + James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - kexec@lists.infradead.org + Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> + linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org> + linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Luis R . Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> - James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> - Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> - Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org> - " Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>\0" + Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + kexec@lists.infradead.org + Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com> + Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> + " Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 14:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:\n" @@ -41,23 +41,23 @@ "> > > hook, is left to the security community.\n" "> > \n" "> > Paul does not have a preference as to adding a new LSM hook or calling\n" - "> > the existing hook. \302\240Either way is fine, as long as both the new and\n" + "> > the existing hook. Either way is fine, as long as both the new and\n" "> > existing hooks call the existing function.\n" "> > \n" "> > Casey didn't like the idea of a wrapper.\n" "> > James suggested renaming the LSM hook.\n" "> > \n" "> > The maintainers for the callers of the LSM hook prefer a meaningful\n" - "> > LSM hook name. \302\240The \"null\" argument is not as much of a concern. \302\240Only\n" + "> > LSM hook name. The \"null\" argument is not as much of a concern. Only\n" "> > Eric seems to be asking for a separate, new LSM hook, without the\n" "> > \"null\" argument.\n" "> > \n" "> > Unless someone really objects, to accommodate Eric we'll define a new\n" - "> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. \302\240Eric, are you planning on\n" + "> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. Eric, are you planning on\n" "> \n" "> I'm confused - isn't that what this patchset did? :)\n" "\n" - "Right. \302\240I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed.\n" + "Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed.\n" "\n" "> \n" "> > Ack'ing patches 1 & 2?\n" @@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ "> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" "> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" "> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n" - "> \n" - "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "kexec mailing list\n" - "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec + > -8ab8d62284abea4dbca03a77dd7226fafc832b41ca28655617b6e5a5e8a81d4e +ab945bfcfc7ad46710ca791ce1725b43e594da72b6e827c440a28448b7c7c3f2
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index e01db16..b45ead3 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 14:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: -> Quoting Mimi Zohar (zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com): +> Quoting Mimi Zohar (zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com): > > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 14:01 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > > Instead of adding the security_kernel_read_file LSM hook - or defining a > > > wrapper for security_kernel_read_file LSM hook and adding it, or @@ -17,23 +17,23 @@ On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 14:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > > > hook, is left to the security community. > > > > Paul does not have a preference as to adding a new LSM hook or calling -> > the existing hook. Either way is fine, as long as both the new and +> > the existing hook. ?Either way is fine, as long as both the new and > > existing hooks call the existing function. > > > > Casey didn't like the idea of a wrapper. > > James suggested renaming the LSM hook. > > > > The maintainers for the callers of the LSM hook prefer a meaningful -> > LSM hook name. The "null" argument is not as much of a concern. Only +> > LSM hook name. ?The "null" argument is not as much of a concern. ?Only > > Eric seems to be asking for a separate, new LSM hook, without the > > "null" argument. > > > > Unless someone really objects, to accommodate Eric we'll define a new -> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. Eric, are you planning on +> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. ?Eric, are you planning on > > I'm confused - isn't that what this patchset did? :) -Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. +Right. ?I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. > > > Ack'ing patches 1 & 2? @@ -41,12 +41,11 @@ Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. > > Mimi > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in -> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org +> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > - -_______________________________________________ -kexec mailing list -kexec@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec +-- +To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in +the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org +More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 7a50fb4..83d7a17 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,29 +1,14 @@ "ref\01527616920-5415-1-git-send-email-zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "ref\01528121025.3237.116.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "ref\020180604193215.GA13553@mail.hallyn.com\0" - "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] kexec/firmware: support system wide policy requiring signatures\0" + "From\0zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v4 0/8] kexec/firmware: support system wide policy requiring signatures\0" "Date\0Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:53:40 -0400\0" - "To\0Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>\0" - "Cc\0Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>" - Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> - Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - kexec@lists.infradead.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org - Luis R . Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> - James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> - Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> - Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org> - " Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>\0" + "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 14:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:\n" - "> Quoting Mimi Zohar (zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com):\n" + "> Quoting Mimi Zohar (zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com):\n" "> > On Tue, 2018-05-29 at 14:01 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:\n" "> > > Instead of adding the security_kernel_read_file LSM hook - or defining a\n" "> > > wrapper for security_kernel_read_file LSM hook and adding it, or\n" @@ -41,23 +26,23 @@ "> > > hook, is left to the security community.\n" "> > \n" "> > Paul does not have a preference as to adding a new LSM hook or calling\n" - "> > the existing hook. \302\240Either way is fine, as long as both the new and\n" + "> > the existing hook. ?Either way is fine, as long as both the new and\n" "> > existing hooks call the existing function.\n" "> > \n" "> > Casey didn't like the idea of a wrapper.\n" "> > James suggested renaming the LSM hook.\n" "> > \n" "> > The maintainers for the callers of the LSM hook prefer a meaningful\n" - "> > LSM hook name. \302\240The \"null\" argument is not as much of a concern. \302\240Only\n" + "> > LSM hook name. ?The \"null\" argument is not as much of a concern. ?Only\n" "> > Eric seems to be asking for a separate, new LSM hook, without the\n" "> > \"null\" argument.\n" "> > \n" "> > Unless someone really objects, to accommodate Eric we'll define a new\n" - "> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. \302\240Eric, are you planning on\n" + "> > LSM hook named security_kernel_load_data. ?Eric, are you planning on\n" "> \n" "> I'm confused - isn't that what this patchset did? :)\n" "\n" - "Right. \302\240I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed.\n" + "Right. ?I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed.\n" "\n" "> \n" "> > Ack'ing patches 1 & 2?\n" @@ -65,14 +50,13 @@ "> > Mimi\n" "> --\n" "> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" - "> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" + "> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n" "> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n" "> \n" "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "kexec mailing list\n" - "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec + "--\n" + "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" + "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n" + More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -8ab8d62284abea4dbca03a77dd7226fafc832b41ca28655617b6e5a5e8a81d4e +42336ec09d6f1a853fad1b7c19f98f2e9032da3d9c9f6ba4ad58fcaa078bff25
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N3/1.txt index e01db16..6aedd84 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N3/1.txt @@ -43,10 +43,4 @@ Right. I'm trying to get consensus whether it is needed. > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -> - - -_______________________________________________ -kexec mailing list -kexec@lists.infradead.org -http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec +> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N3/content_digest index 7a50fb4..0655732 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N3/content_digest @@ -5,21 +5,21 @@ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] kexec/firmware: support system wide policy requiring signatures\0" "Date\0Mon, 04 Jun 2018 15:53:40 -0400\0" "To\0Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>\0" - "Cc\0Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com>" - Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + "Cc\0Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>" + James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> - Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> - Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - kexec@lists.infradead.org + Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> + linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org> + linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Luis R . Rodriguez <mcgrof@kernel.org> - James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> - Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> - Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> - linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org> - " Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>\0" + Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> + kexec@lists.infradead.org + Andres Rodriguez <andresx7@gmail.com> + Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> + Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> + " Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 14:32 -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:\n" @@ -67,12 +67,6 @@ "> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n" "> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org\n" "> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html\n" - "> \n" - "\n" - "\n" - "_______________________________________________\n" - "kexec mailing list\n" - "kexec@lists.infradead.org\n" - http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec + > -8ab8d62284abea4dbca03a77dd7226fafc832b41ca28655617b6e5a5e8a81d4e +85dbc8c6cd9bf8bcb11bb019759180718b068eca34c51c9da1d280e42eab72c9
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.