From: "Desroches L." <ludovic.desroches@gmail.com>
To: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: [Virtex4] kernel2.6 or distribution
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:48:52 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15291528.post@talk.nabble.com> (raw)
Hi,
Sorry for my English, I am a French student. For my internship, I have to
implement Linux on a Virtex4.
I know a few things about the Virtex4 because I am specialized in digital
electronic (VHDL). I have to choose a solution for the Linux to implement.
At this stage, I have some problems to determine the best solution probably
because things are not clear for me whereas I have read a book about Linux
embedded and seen a lot of websites.
I have seen several distributions (maybe my vocable is false) from
MontaVista, LynuxWorks and others. I have seen also kernel2.6 for Virtex4
(http://git.xilinx.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=3Dlinux-2.6-xlnx.git;a=3Dsummar=
y). I
would like to understand the difference between these two things.
If I have understood MontaVista for example offers a solution with a C
library and drivers, isn't it ? So is it a better solution than kernel2.6 ?
I prefer to start with the kernel given by xilinx, it is an internship so
the aim is to learn the more I can but I have to convince my tutor that it
is a better solution than MontaVista, BlueCat or =C2=B5C/OSII. Do you have =
some
arguments ?
Thanks for your help
Best Regards
---
Desroches Ludovic
ESIEE engineer : http://www.esiee.fr
--=20
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Virtex4--kernel2.6-or-=
distribution-tp15291528p15291528.html
Sent from the linuxppc-embedded mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
next reply other threads:[~2008-02-05 15:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-05 15:48 Desroches L. [this message]
2008-02-06 19:06 ` [Virtex4] kernel2.6 or distribution Stephen Neuendorffer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15291528.post@talk.nabble.com \
--to=ludovic.desroches@gmail.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.