All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, tj@kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Fix the section attribute on UP DECLARE_PER_CPU()
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:57:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15312.1239731865@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0904140954160.18124@localhost.localdomain>

Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> We should have the DECLARE_PER_CPU() #defines next to the DEFINE_PER_CPU 
> ones, rather than somewhere else.
> 
> So moving the logic to <asm-generic/percpu.h> is wrong - make it all be in 
> <linux/percpu.h> so that they can be maintained together.

Agreed, it would be nice.  However, x86 requires it to be declared in the
middle of asm/percpu.h (ie: in asm-generic/percpu.h).  I'm trying to sort it
out, but it's like trying to juggle hyperdimensional spaghetti:-/ How much
header file overhaul do you wish to indulge in?  And can I split some headers
into separate headers for declarations and inline functions?

David

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-14 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-14 16:10 [PATCH] FRV: Fix the section attribute on UP DECLARE_PER_CPU() David Howells
2009-04-14 16:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-14 17:57   ` David Howells [this message]
2009-04-14 18:06     ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-15 10:24       ` David Howells
2009-04-15 15:19         ` Linus Torvalds
2009-04-15 16:49           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 11:40       ` David Howells
2009-04-15 12:03         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 13:20           ` David Howells
2009-04-15 14:09             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-15 15:09               ` David Howells
2009-04-15 16:54                 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-21 18:36                   ` David Howells
2009-04-22  9:12                     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15312.1239731865@redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.