[U-Boot] [PATCH 5/5] arm: dts: socfpga: stratix10: update pdma

[Chee, Tien Fong <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>]

On Mon, 2018-07-09 at 22:28 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 07/09/2018 08:03 PM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On 05/31/2018 03:08 AM, tien.fong.chee at intel.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > From: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Update pdma properties for Stratix 10
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Tien Fong Chee <tien.fong.chee@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> > > b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> > > index ccd3f32..311ba09 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/socfpga_stratix10.dtsi
> > > @@ -82,6 +82,26 @@
> > >  		ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
> > >  		u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
> > >  
> > > +		amba {
> > > +			u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
> > > +			compatible = "arm,amba-bus";
> > > +			#address-cells = <1>;
> > > +			#size-cells = <1>;
> > > +			ranges;
> > > +
> > > +			pdma: pdma at ffda0000 {
> > > +					u-boot,dm-pre-reloc;
> > > +					compatible =
> > > "arm,pl330", "arm,dma330";
> > I think you got "arm,dma330" binding wrong. I don't see any binding
> > with
> > that name.
Here https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/923234/ .
> I think the whole idea of using pl330 to scrub ECC DRAM is wrong. It
> adds massive amount of code while a CPU can do the same and faster,
> cfr
> arria10.
> 
I just measured the performance of initializing DRAM based on custodian
arria10_sdmmc, which is around 16sec with 1GB.

Using DMA to init the DDR, which is around 3-4sec for 2GB. I attached
screenshot for the print out based on arria10_sdmmc custodian.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sdram_ecc_timing.png
Type: image/png
Size: 119153 bytes
Desc: sdram_ecc_timing.png
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20180710/bf2d3d41/attachment.png>