From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: LMML <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] media: usb: uvc: use vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish helper
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 20:11:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532665.63kW7uD9fo@avalon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8sAUDo+ut1t2_twy6hNjX5WQpridCEm6NrNmrwQvR1Nrw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Prabhakar,
On Friday 28 November 2014 17:06:52 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Prabhakar,
>
> [Snip]
>
> >> + queue->queue.lock = &queue->mutex;
> >
> > I'm a bit concerned that this would introduce future breakages. Setting
> > the queue.lock pointer enables locking in all vb2_fop_* and vb2_ops_wait_*
> > functions. The uvcvideo driver isn't ready for that, but doesn't use the
> > vb2_fop_* functions yet, so that's not an issue. However, in the future,
> > videobuf2 might use the lock in more places, including functions used by
> > the uvcvideo driver. This could then cause breakages.
>
> Even if in future if videobuf2 uses this lock it would be in helpers mostly,
> so any way it doesn’t harm :)
My concern is about vb2 starting using the lock in existing helpers used by
the uvcvideo driver. I suppose we can deal with it later.
> > It would be better to completely convert the uvcvideo driver to the
> > vb2_fop_* functions if we want to use vb2_ops_*. I'm not sure how complex
> > that would be though, and whether it would be possible while still
> > keeping the fine-grained locking implemented by the uvcvideo driver. Do
> > you think it should be attempted ?
>
> mmap & poll should be fairly simple, looks like open & release cannot be
> dropped as it does some usb_autopm_get/put_interface() calls which I am not
> aware of.
I've looked at that, and there's a race condition in vb2_fop_poll() (for which
I've already sent a patch) and possible in vb2_mmap() (raised the issue on
#v4l today) as well that need to be fixed first.
Anyway, for this patch
Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Have you tested it by the way ?
Should I take it in my tree or will you send a pull request for the whole
series ?
> >> ret = vb2_queue_init(&queue->queue);
> >> if (ret)
> >> return ret;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-29 18:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-26 23:25 [PATCH v3] media: usb: uvc: use vb2_ops_wait_prepare/finish helper Lad, Prabhakar
2014-11-27 21:32 ` Laurent Pinchart
2014-11-28 17:06 ` Prabhakar Lad
2014-11-29 18:11 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2014-11-29 18:25 ` Prabhakar Lad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532665.63kW7uD9fo@avalon \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.