From: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: candidates for @devel-rt localversion-rt++
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2018 13:47:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532864867.1618.32.camel@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532847330.1618.8.camel@gmx.de>
FYI, per kvm unit tests, 4.16-rt definitely has more kvm issues.
huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests # uname -r
4.16.18-rt11-rt
huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests # ./run_tests.sh
PASS selftest-setup (2 tests)
FAIL selftest-vectors-kernel
FAIL selftest-vectors-user
PASS selftest-smp (65 tests)
PASS pci-test (1 tests)
PASS pmu (3 tests)
FAIL gicv2-ipi
FAIL gicv3-ipi
FAIL gicv2-active
FAIL gicv3-active
PASS psci (4 tests)
FAIL timer
huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests #
4.14-rt passes all tests. The above is with the kvm raw_spinlock_t
conversion patch applied, but the 4.12 based SLERT tree I cloned to
explore arm-land in the first place shows only one timer failure, and
has/needs it applied as well, which would seem to vindicate it.
huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests # uname -r
4.12.14-0.gec0b559-rt
huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests # ./run_tests.sh
PASS selftest-setup (2 tests)
PASS selftest-vectors-kernel (2 tests)
PASS selftest-vectors-user (2 tests)
PASS selftest-smp (65 tests)
PASS pci-test (1 tests)
PASS pmu (3 tests)
PASS gicv2-ipi (3 tests)
PASS gicv3-ipi (3 tests)
PASS gicv2-active (1 tests)
PASS gicv3-active (1 tests)
PASS psci (4 tests)
FAIL timer (8 tests, 1 unexpected failures)
huawei5:/abuild/mike/kvm-unit-tests #
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-29 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-27 21:57 [ANNOUNCE] v4.16.18-rt11 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2018-07-28 9:07 ` candidates for @devel-rt localversion-rt++ Mike Galbraith
2018-07-28 9:13 ` [rt-patch 1/3] arm64/acpi/perf: move pmu allocation to an early CPU up hook Mike Galbraith
2018-08-02 13:45 ` [rt-patch 1/3 v2] " Mike Galbraith
2018-07-29 6:55 ` candidates for @devel-rt localversion-rt++ Mike Galbraith
2018-07-29 11:47 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2018-07-30 16:24 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-07-31 18:28 ` bisected - arm64 kvm unit test failures Mike Galbraith
2018-08-01 5:35 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-01 6:02 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-01 7:22 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-01 7:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-01 9:20 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-21 15:34 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-22 13:38 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-22 13:50 ` Marc Zyngier
2018-08-22 13:57 ` Mike Galbraith
[not found] ` <1532764179.9882.14.camel@gmx.de>
2018-07-28 9:07 ` [rt-patch 2/3] sched: Introduce raw_cond_resched_lock() Mike Galbraith
2018-07-28 9:07 ` [rt-patch 3/3] arm, KVM: convert vgic_irq.irq_lock to raw_spinlock_t Mike Galbraith
2018-07-30 9:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 13:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-02 6:56 ` [rt-patch 4/3] arm,KVM: Move phys_timer handling to hard irq context Mike Galbraith
2018-08-02 16:31 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-02 16:50 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-02 17:43 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-04 12:25 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-05 4:52 ` Mike Galbraith
2018-08-07 14:46 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1532864867.1618.32.camel@gmx.de \
--to=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.