All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-team <kernel-team@fb.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 15:15:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1532978146.28585.32.camel@surriel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180730162653.GM2494@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2469 bytes --]

On Mon, 2018-07-30 at 18:26 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 10:30:11AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> 
> > > What happened to the rework I did there? That not only avoided
> > > fiddling
> > > with active_mm, but also avoids grab/drop cycles for the other
> > > architectures when doing task->kthread->kthread->task things.
> > 
> > I don't think I saw that. I only saw your email from
> > July 20th with this fragment of code, which does not
> > appear to avoid the grab/drop cycles, and still fiddles
> > with active_mm:
> 
> Yeah, that's it. Note how it doesn't do a grab+drop for kernel-
> >kernel,
> where the current could would have.
> 
> And also note that it only fiddles with active_mm if it does the
> grab+drop thing (the below should have s/ifdef/ifndef/ to make more
> sense maybe).

I'll kick off a test with your variant. I don't think we
will see any performance difference on x86 (due to not
using a refcount at all any more), but unless Ingo is in
a hurry I guess there's no issue rewriting this part of
the patch series :)

Do the other patches look ok to you and Andy?


> So for ARCH_NO_ACTIVE_MM we never touch ->active_mm and therefore
> ->active_mm == ->mm.
> 
> > +       /*
> > +        * kernel -> kernel   lazy + transfer active
> > +        *   user -> kernel   lazy + mmgrab() active
> > +        *
> > +        * kernel ->   user   switch + mmdrop() active
> > +        *   user ->   user   switch
> > +        */
> > +       if (!next->mm) {                                // to
> > kernel
> > +               enter_lazy_tlb(prev->active_mm, next);
> > +
> 
> #ifndef ARCH_NO_ACTIVE_MM
> > +               next->active_mm = prev->active_mm;
> > +               if (prev->mm)                           // from
> > user
> > +                       mmgrab(prev->active_mm);
> 
> 		else
> 			prev->active_mm = NULL;
> > +#endif
> > +       } else {                                        // to user
> > +               switch_mm_irqs_off(prev->active_mm, next->mm,
> > next);
> > +
> 
> #ifndef ARCH_NO_ACTIVE_MM
> > +               if (!prev->mm) {                        // from
> > kernel
> > +                       /* will mmdrop() in finish_task_switch().
> > */
> > +                       rq->prev_mm = prev->active_mm;
> > +                       prev->active_mm = NULL;
> > +               }
> > +#endif
> 
> 
> 
-- 
All Rights Reversed.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-30 19:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-28 21:53 [PATCH 0/10] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86,tlb: clarify memory barrier in switch_mm_irqs_off Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 02/10] smp: use __cpumask_set_cpu in on_each_cpu_cond Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:59   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 03/10] smp,cpumask: introduce on_each_cpu_cond_mask Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:57   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:00     ` Rik van Riel
     [not found]       ` <E710FBA5-CC5E-4941-ACBF-4AB3424F1F68@amacapital.net>
2018-07-29 17:39         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 17:51         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 18:55           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 19:56             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86,mm: use on_each_cpu_cond for TLB flushes Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  2:58   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:02     ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm,tlb: turn dummy defines into inline functions Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm,x86: skip cr4 and ldt reload when mm stays the same Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  4:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86,mm: remove leave_mm cpu argument Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 08/10] arch,mm: add config variable to skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm,x86: shoot down lazy TLB references at exit_mmap time Rik van Riel
2018-07-28 21:53 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-29  4:21   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 12:11     ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 15:29       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-29 16:55         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 19:54     ` [PATCH v2 10/11] x86,tlb: really leave mm on shootdown Rik van Riel
2018-07-29 19:54     ` [PATCH v2 11/11] mm,sched: conditionally skip lazy TLB mm refcounting Rik van Riel
2018-07-30  9:55       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 14:30         ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 16:26           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 19:15             ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2018-07-30 19:30               ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-30 19:36                 ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 19:49                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-30 21:46                     ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-30 22:00                       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-31  1:05             ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-31  9:12               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-31 14:29                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-07-31 15:03                   ` Rik van Riel
2018-07-31 15:12                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-30 11:32 ` [PATCH 0/10] x86,tlb,mm: more lazy TLB cleanups & optimizations Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1532978146.28585.32.camel@surriel.com \
    --to=riel@surriel.com \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.