Re: [PATCH] firmware: make sure builtin firmware is page alignment

["Zhang, Ning A" <ning.a.zhang@intel.com>]

在 2018-08-03五的 12:31 +0200，gregkh@linuxfoundation.org写道：
> On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 08:42:25AM +0000, Zhang, Ning A wrote:
> > 在 2018-08-03五的 07:39 +0200，Greg KH写道：
> > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 09:45:21AM +0800, Zhang Ning wrote:
> > > > when firmware is in filesystem, request_firmware will load it,
> > > > and copy it to vmalloc memory, that is page align memory.
> > > > 
> > > > but when firmware is builtin, it is 8 bytes or 4 bytes
> > > > alignment.
> > > > 
> > > > make sure builtin firmware is page algnment, that can simplify
> > > > algorithm
> > > > to handle firmware.
> > > 
> > > How is it simplified?  I don't see any such change like that here
> > > :(
> > > 
> > 
> > Thank you for review this patch.
> > 
> > When driver handles its firmware based on  page, like below:
> > 
> > 	struct page *p;
> > 	p = vmalloc_to_page(fw->data);  // for filesystem firmware
> > 	p = virt_to_page(fw->data); // for builtin firmware
> > 
> > but if builtin firmware is not page alignment, page pointer for
> > builtin
> > firmware is wrong, it contains memory not belong to firmware.
> > drivers
> > has to use additional code to handle this. 
> > 
> > if builtin firmware is also page alignment, no need additional code
> > to
> > handle builtin firmware. simplified.
> 
> But you did not change anything like this in your code, so why would
> I
> know this?

I understand it is very difficult to review this patch without context.
The driver is not opensource, I can't show the patch for driver.

this patch changes kernel common code, and it has value to upstream, so
I submit this patch for review and also look forward some advises from
community. Once we decide to opensource, the driver changes will be
there.




> Please fix this up submit this properly.
> 
> greg k-h