From: Armin Kuster <akuster808@gmail.com>
To: akuster@mvista.com, openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: [ROCKO][PATCH 27/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-17125
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2018 08:35:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1533742522-24357-27-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1533742522-24357-1-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com>
From: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
Affects: <= 2.29.1
Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
---
meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.1.inc | 1 +
.../binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-17125.patch | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 130 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-17125.patch
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.1.inc b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.1.inc
index 577bbf0..c4d40ea 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.1.inc
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.29.1.inc
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
file://CVE-2017-17080.patch \
file://CVE-2017-17121.patch \
file://CVE-2017-17122.patch \
+ file://CVE-2017-17125.patch \
"
S = "${WORKDIR}/git"
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-17125.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-17125.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..30dc6d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/CVE-2017-17125.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
+From 160b1a618ad94988410dc81fce9189fcda5b7ff4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
+Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2017 23:18:22 +1030
+Subject: [PATCH] PR22443, Global buffer overflow in
+ _bfd_elf_get_symbol_version_string
+
+Symbols like *ABS* defined in bfd/section.c:global_syms are not
+elf_symbol_type. They can appear on relocs and perhaps other places
+in an ELF bfd, so a number of places in nm.c and objdump.c are wrong
+to cast an asymbol based on the bfd being ELF. I think we lose
+nothing by excluding all section symbols, not just the global_syms.
+
+ PR 22443
+ * nm.c (sort_symbols_by_size): Don't attempt to access
+ section symbol internal_elf_sym.
+ (print_symbol): Likewise. Don't call bfd_get_symbol_version_string
+ for section symbols.
+ * objdump.c (compare_symbols): Don't attempt to access
+ section symbol internal_elf_sym.
+ (objdump_print_symname): Don't call bfd_get_symbol_version_string
+ for section symbols.
+
+Upstream-Status: Backport
+Affects: <= 2.29.1
+CVE: CVE-2017-17125
+Signed-off-by: Armin Kuster <akuster@mvista.com>
+
+---
+ binutils/ChangeLog | 12 ++++++++++++
+ binutils/nm.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
+ binutils/objdump.c | 6 +++---
+ 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
+
+Index: git/binutils/nm.c
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/binutils/nm.c
++++ git/binutils/nm.c
+@@ -765,7 +765,6 @@ sort_symbols_by_size (bfd *abfd, bfd_boo
+ asection *sec;
+ bfd_vma sz;
+ asymbol *temp;
+- int synthetic = (sym->flags & BSF_SYNTHETIC);
+
+ if (from + size < fromend)
+ {
+@@ -782,10 +781,13 @@ sort_symbols_by_size (bfd *abfd, bfd_boo
+ sec = bfd_get_section (sym);
+
+ /* Synthetic symbols don't have a full type set of data available, thus
+- we can't rely on that information for the symbol size. */
+- if (!synthetic && bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour)
++ we can't rely on that information for the symbol size. Ditto for
++ bfd/section.c:global_syms like *ABS*. */
++ if ((sym->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) == 0
++ && bfd_get_flavour (abfd) == bfd_target_elf_flavour)
+ sz = ((elf_symbol_type *) sym)->internal_elf_sym.st_size;
+- else if (!synthetic && bfd_is_com_section (sec))
++ else if ((sym->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) == 0
++ && bfd_is_com_section (sec))
+ sz = sym->value;
+ else
+ {
+@@ -874,8 +876,9 @@ print_symbol (bfd * abfd,
+
+ info.sinfo = &syminfo;
+ info.ssize = ssize;
+- /* Synthetic symbols do not have a full symbol type set of data available. */
+- if ((sym->flags & BSF_SYNTHETIC) != 0)
++ /* Synthetic symbols do not have a full symbol type set of data available.
++ Nor do bfd/section.c:global_syms like *ABS*. */
++ if ((sym->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) != 0)
+ {
+ info.elfinfo = NULL;
+ info.coffinfo = NULL;
+@@ -893,7 +896,7 @@ print_symbol (bfd * abfd,
+ const char * version_string = NULL;
+ bfd_boolean hidden = FALSE;
+
+- if ((sym->flags & BSF_SYNTHETIC) == 0)
++ if ((sym->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) == 0)
+ version_string = bfd_get_symbol_version_string (abfd, sym, &hidden);
+
+ if (bfd_is_und_section (bfd_get_section (sym)))
+Index: git/binutils/objdump.c
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/binutils/objdump.c
++++ git/binutils/objdump.c
+@@ -799,10 +799,10 @@ compare_symbols (const void *ap, const v
+ bfd_vma asz, bsz;
+
+ asz = 0;
+- if ((a->flags & BSF_SYNTHETIC) == 0)
++ if ((a->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) == 0)
+ asz = ((elf_symbol_type *) a)->internal_elf_sym.st_size;
+ bsz = 0;
+- if ((b->flags & BSF_SYNTHETIC) == 0)
++ if ((b->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) == 0)
+ bsz = ((elf_symbol_type *) b)->internal_elf_sym.st_size;
+ if (asz != bsz)
+ return asz > bsz ? -1 : 1;
+@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ objdump_print_symname (bfd *abfd, struct
+ name = alloc;
+ }
+
+- if ((sym->flags & BSF_SYNTHETIC) == 0)
++ if ((sym->flags & (BSF_SECTION_SYM | BSF_SYNTHETIC)) == 0)
+ version_string = bfd_get_symbol_version_string (abfd, sym, &hidden);
+
+ if (bfd_is_und_section (bfd_get_section (sym)))
+Index: git/binutils/ChangeLog
+===================================================================
+--- git.orig/binutils/ChangeLog
++++ git/binutils/ChangeLog
+@@ -1,3 +1,15 @@
++2017-11-18 Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
++
++ PR 22443
++ * nm.c (sort_symbols_by_size): Don't attempt to access
++ section symbol internal_elf_sym.
++ (print_symbol): Likewise. Don't call bfd_get_symbol_version_string
++ for section symbols.
++ * objdump.c (compare_symbols): Don't attempt to access
++ section symbol internal_elf_sym.
++ (objdump_print_symname): Don't call bfd_get_symbol_version_string
++ for section symbols.
++
+ 2017-11-29 Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>
+
+ PR 22508
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-08 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-08 15:34 [ROCKO][PATCH 01/27] binutils: Security fix CVE-2017-12967 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:34 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 02/27] binutils: Secuirty fix CVE-2017-14930 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:34 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 03/27] binutls: Security fix CVE-2017-14932 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:34 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 04/27] binutls: Security fix CVE-2017-14933 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 05/27] binutls: Security fix CVE-2017-14934 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 06/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-14938 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 07/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-14939 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 08/27] binutils: Security fix for CVE-2017-14940 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 09/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15021 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 10/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15022 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 11/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15023 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 12/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15024 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 13/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15025 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 14/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15225 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 15/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15939 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 16/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-15996 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 17/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16826 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 18/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16827 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 19/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16828 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 20/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16829 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 21/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16830 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 22/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16831 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 23/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-16832 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 24/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-17080 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 25/27] Binutils: Security fix for CVE-2017-17121 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 26/27] binutls: Security fix for CVE-2017-17122 Armin Kuster
2018-08-08 15:35 ` Armin Kuster [this message]
2018-08-08 16:06 ` ✗ patchtest: failure for "[ROCKO] binutils: Security fix..." and 26 more Patchwork
2018-08-08 16:40 ` [ROCKO][PATCH 01/27] binutils: Security fix CVE-2017-12967 akuster808
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1533742522-24357-27-git-send-email-akuster808@gmail.com \
--to=akuster808@gmail.com \
--cc=akuster@mvista.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.