All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: "Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>,
	"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: kill intel_display_power_well_is_enabled()
Date: Wed, 08 Aug 2018 15:55:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1533768945.2740.13.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <582c1fabf92ae9e60525ec10a4f6734bfb7dd840.camel@intel.com>

Em Qua, 2018-08-08 às 15:22 -0700, Souza, Jose escreveu:
> On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 15:16 -0700, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> > Use the same coding pattern as we use in the other functions of the
> > same file: just call lookup_power_well() directly in the only
> > caller.
> > 
> > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c | 20 +++-----------------
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > index e209edbc561d..e0947f662361 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_runtime_pm.c
> > @@ -49,9 +49,6 @@
> >   * present for a given platform.
> >   */
> >  
> > -bool intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > -					 enum i915_power_well_id
> > power_well_id);
> > -
> >  static struct i915_power_well *
> >  lookup_power_well(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> >  		  enum i915_power_well_id power_well_id);
> > @@ -678,8 +675,9 @@ static void assert_csr_loaded(struct
> > drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> >  
> >  static void assert_can_enable_dc5(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv)
> >  {
> > -	bool pg2_enabled =
> > intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(dev_priv,
> > -					SKL_DISP_PW_2);
> > +	struct i915_power_well *pg2 = lookup_power_well(dev_priv,
> > +							SKL_DISP_P
> > W_2);
> > +	bool pg2_enabled = pg2->desc->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv,
> > pg2);
> 
> Why not trust our sync with hardware and use pg2->hw_enabled?

While that's a very reasonable thing and it sounds like something we
should do (as far as I have investigated in 5 minutes), it's a
functional change with a potential downside and should be in a separate
patch IMHO.

> 
> >  
> >  	WARN_ONCE(pg2_enabled, "PG2 not disabled to enable
> > DC5.\n");
> >  
> > @@ -2302,18 +2300,6 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc
> > chv_power_wells[] = {
> >  	},
> >  };
> >  
> > -bool intel_display_power_well_is_enabled(struct drm_i915_private
> > *dev_priv,
> > -					 enum i915_power_well_id
> > power_well_id)
> > -{
> > -	struct i915_power_well *power_well;
> > -	bool ret;
> > -
> > -	power_well = lookup_power_well(dev_priv, power_well_id);
> > -	ret = power_well->desc->ops->is_enabled(dev_priv,
> > power_well);
> > -
> > -	return ret;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static const struct i915_power_well_desc skl_power_wells[] = {
> >  	{
> >  		.name = "always-on",
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-08 22:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-08 22:16 [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: kill intel_display_power_well_is_enabled() Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-08 22:16 ` [PATCH 2/4] drm/i915: BUG() if we can't lookup_power_well() Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-08 22:16 ` [PATCH 3/4] drm/i915: use for_each_power_well in lookup_power_well() Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-08 22:50   ` Souza, Jose
2018-08-08 22:16 ` [PATCH 4/4] drm/i915: move lookup_power_well() up Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-08 22:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] drm/i915: kill intel_display_power_well_is_enabled() Souza, Jose
2018-08-08 22:55   ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2018-08-08 22:22 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for series starting with [1/4] " Patchwork
2018-08-08 22:58   ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-09  6:29     ` Michal Wajdeczko
2018-08-09 17:15       ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-08 22:38 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-08-09  1:16 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-08-15 20:27 ` [PATCH 1/4] " Imre Deak
2018-08-17 23:41   ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-20 23:11     ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-21 11:12       ` Imre Deak
2018-08-21 19:54         ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-08-22 10:21           ` Imre Deak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1533768945.2740.13.camel@intel.com \
    --to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.