Re: [PATCH] bitfield: avoid gcc-8 -Wint-in-bool-context warning

[Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>]

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 08:57 +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> 2018-08-14 7:09 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
> > Passing an enum into FIELD_GET() produces a long but harmless warning on
> > newer compilers:
> > 
> >                  from include/linux/linkage.h:7,
> >                  from include/linux/kernel.h:7,
> >                  from include/linux/skbuff.h:17,
> >                  from include/linux/if_ether.h:23,
> >                  from include/linux/etherdevice.h:25,
> >                  from drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:63:
> > drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c: In function 'iwl_mvm_rx_mpdu_mq':
> > include/linux/bitfield.h:56:20: error: enum constant in boolean context [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
> >    BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(!(_mask), _pfx "mask is zero"); \
> >                     ^
> > ...
> > include/linux/bitfield.h:103:3: note: in expansion of macro '__BF_FIELD_CHECK'
> >    __BF_FIELD_CHECK(_mask, _reg, 0U, "FIELD_GET: "); \
> >    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rxmq.c:1025:21: note: in expansion of macro 'FIELD_GET'
> >     le16_encode_bits(FIELD_GET(IWL_RX_HE_PHY_SIBG_SYM_OR_USER_NUM_MASK,
> 
> 
> How about fixing the root cause
> in drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/api/rx.h ?
> 
> 
> #define IWL_RX_HE_PHY_SIBG_SYM_OR_USER_NUM_MASK   0x1e00000000ULL
> 
> 
> enum iwl_rx_he_phy looks really strange.

Why? I don't think this is a problem, the enum is used here to get
constants so that we can also have documentation for them. That's a
common and accepted technique.


> Passing enum to FIELD_GET is odd,
> so I prefer keeping this warned.

What for?

I think we should go with Arend's patch, and I hope Andrew will pick it
up, but otherwise I guess we can also put it through any other tree.

johannes