From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1F8A6E00726; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:08:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (max.oss.09[at]gmail.com) * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.208.51 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8DFE00566 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:08:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id h1-v6so1367013eds.1 for ; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:08:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=h6NblxwEXtOrmDCbmf/kqKVYipxZzlkNNlph0WQX5HY=; b=VYQfcWWL9uGMGbLRH5RndeTrSqiAQMdicHn+VKTOMJjA+zcPIIfwwUhDeO/bOhqH1t JKPLIigFgTmX2NNJgTFdLkxQPiGs3jMsL7CnWxALNbllA7ua8tCZw5z++/ku5dKjlplk dVcxYGQnM29hvhF9s+7TdeBBMUTZJ2JZZGh7QypYAd4GHbhmyOACrtkC1rtJM7QnGvVN wMW8AW2f4/5Ws2vR3260IuuDWRAKY+lYUuFOLVhfFr1RTXLSMSH+F3pTkI2iX9Bdv3s8 vqpWP4kBAbvS5/Uklfg2QxpZHqmC47hWprLJeBjL9YrdZKC/dPqzxzvi5qy7MnY+zoc4 Bj1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:date:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=h6NblxwEXtOrmDCbmf/kqKVYipxZzlkNNlph0WQX5HY=; b=UqMBwA3LoiC7SsqcxQRIWBe3iavLrdWpUQFps0ZN9V54GGInJo65pUCyOWA++FB3Fu uE0Z9EaFtvtzCC3WdYrtwSzjoz+YMEyQGKDj/av3+eIZJtcTRfPO3BZjofaxgE8t1cvq IB3wQPy1HPa9KUWKXcalXROY380CYvz9GAoXvbJSArrFjEGskbG1y2prnTCT2WX+5Cyi 0IoCrg30hRaMDWEcIbD0d3YLR43HIjDz9a15c6mFnvq9nmhOt4+sNA9VIvfYG63bByQj 7lbxArmCK5VswZauPHFdbtWn0LbmBn3PxIEUA2YLrwyqFP/K/6pQT+/LHRluU0XiZ9RK YgXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlElLeZpXTpPIuEbyucT44Dtg4KCQcJthtluelwJTI8GaNrCbInZ KpOxRg8W5qBAvYd+DpdtfpfMGI1V X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA+uWPysyTzDLSxEr4GnXJE0P+xQNpLhGGqiSNj3aIfOgmrph9KZKi8jygGhVWSEFTbec/LW4cGkXw== X-Received: by 2002:a50:a5d8:: with SMTP id b24-v6mr34290774edc.235.1534360114736; Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:08:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Saturn.local.all ([195.48.14.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a15-v6sm25193476edd.47.2018.08.15.12.08.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Aug 2018 12:08:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <1534360113.4797.3.camel@gmail.com> From: Max Krummenacher To: Steve Pavao , yocto@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 21:08:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <9987A072-988B-440A-9A7C-2132D963E7EA@korgrd.com> References: <9987A072-988B-440A-9A7C-2132D963E7EA@korgrd.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.26.6 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [meta-raspberrypi] core-image-minimal for raspberrypi3-64 manifest/sdimg contains no kernel modules X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2018 19:08:36 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Am Mittwoch, den 15.08.2018, 02:47 -0400 schrieb Steve Pavao: > There seems to be a problem with the core-image-minimal bitbake for raspberrypi3-64 target at head > of sumo in all repos. I wonder if it’s also a problem for the raspberrypi3 target. > > No kernel modules appear in the .manifest, and no kernel modules are put into the sdimg. It’s > hard to believe it’s true, but that’s what I'm seeing. > > The problem does NOT occur for the rpi-hwup-image bitbake, which is actually deprecated in poky > 2.5/sumo. > > Before you retire the rpi-hwup-image bitbake target, will you please make sure that the kernel > modules from the core-image-minimal build make it into the .manifest and therefore into the sdimg? > > Please let me know where to log this issue, so I can send you the .manifest diffs, some ls command > output showing the large size difference between the core-image-minimal and rpi-hwup-image sdimg > files for identical builds, and perhaps some file listings to show that one of the builds contains > kernel modules (rpi-hwup-image) and the other does not (core-image-minimal). > > Steve Pavao > Korg R&D > Note that the 'kernel-modules' package is one of the packages built by a kernel recipe. It is a meta package which RDEPENDS on all kernel module packages built by your kernel configuration. So adding that package to your image should do the trick. Max