All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockdep limitations/bugs
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2018 19:15:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1534871755.25523.32.camel@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180821160039.GO3978217@devbig004.ftw2.facebook.com> (sfid-20180821_180043_407003_1DE29E4C)

Hi Tejun,

> > Let's say we again have an ordered workqueue, and the following:
> > 
> > work1_function
> > {
> > 	mutex_lock(&mutex);
> > }
> 
> Regular mutexes complain when the locker isn't the unlocker already.
> Do we really care about this case?

Oh, sorry for the confusion. I was just eliding the - not very
interesting for this case - unlock. Really I should've typed up a
lock/unlock pair in all of the examples.

johannes

      reply	other threads:[~2018-08-21 20:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-21 12:03 [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockdep limitations/bugs Johannes Berg
2018-08-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] workqueue: skip lockdep wq dependency in cancel_work_sync() Johannes Berg
2018-08-21 16:08   ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-21 17:18     ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-21 17:27       ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-21 17:30         ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-21 17:55           ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-21 19:20             ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-22  2:45               ` Byungchul Park
2018-08-22  4:02                 ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-22  5:47                   ` Byungchul Park
2018-08-22  7:07                     ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-22  7:50                       ` Byungchul Park
2018-08-22  8:02                         ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-22  9:15                           ` Byungchul Park
2018-08-22  9:42                             ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-22 12:47                               ` Byungchul Park
2018-08-21 12:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] workqueue: create lockdep dependency in flush_work() Johannes Berg
2018-08-21 16:09   ` Tejun Heo
2018-08-21 17:19     ` Johannes Berg
2018-08-21 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] workqueue lockdep limitations/bugs Tejun Heo
2018-08-21 17:15   ` Johannes Berg [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1534871755.25523.32.camel@sipsolutions.net \
    --to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.