From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s3.sipsolutions.net ([144.76.43.62]:35700 "EHLO sipsolutions.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727544AbeH2Kwh (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:52:37 -0400 Message-ID: <1535525825.5215.1.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180829_085720_148158_0E458EE3) Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: do not aggregate frames if max_frags is set to one From: Johannes Berg To: Lorenzo Bianconi Cc: linux-wireless , Felix Fietkau , sara.sharon@intel.com Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:57:05 +0200 In-Reply-To: (sfid-20180828_234116_503513_760A1610) References: <1535490861.20033.8.camel@sipsolutions.net> (sfid-20180828_234116_503513_760A1610) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 2018-08-28 at 23:41 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > Assuming the A-MSDU subframe is composed by two packets, the last one > must not contain padding, is my understanding correct? Yes. More generally, assuming the A-MSDU subframe is composed of *any number of* packets, the last one must not contain padding :) > > My colleague Sara (CC'ed now) has a patch to fix all of this (we just > > did that this morning). I'll send it out tomorrow morning. Can I bother > > you to try that? > > > > Sure, no worries :) Thanks, patch coming up in a second. > > We'd have to fix the first point independently though, or I guess we can > > roll that into our bugfix too, which would you prefer? > > > > johannes > > > > If the patch is already done I can add the fix for the first point on > top of it, does it sound good? Perfect. johannes