All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Derrick, Jonathan" <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
To: "helgaas@kernel.org" <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"Busch, Keith" <keith.busch@intel.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI/VMD: Set up firmware first if capable
Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2018 23:04:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1536102260.14847.0.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180904130839.GA107892@bhelgaas-glaptop.roam.corp.google.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4735 bytes --]

Thanks for the comments.
I'll try to get those answers

On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 08:08 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2018 at 06:30:03PM -0600, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > Some VMD devices will want to use firmware first error-handling on
> > the
> > entire domain. This is detected by the BIOS setting the VMD
> > endpoint's
> > interface to 0x1.
> 
> I assume there's some spec that codifies this "programming interface
> 0x1 means firmware-first".  Can you reference that section of the
> spec?  Even if it's not public, it will help people who maintain this
> in the future.
> 
> I also have questions along the lines of Keith's: how are errors
> reported in the non-firmware-first case, and in the firmware-first
> case, how are the errors passed on to the OS?
> 
> > Detect this condition and propogate it to the entire domain.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/pci/common.c        | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >  drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/pci/common.c b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
> > index d4ec117..f07f2e4 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/pci/common.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/pci/common.c
> > @@ -663,8 +663,23 @@ static void set_dma_domain_ops(struct pci_dev
> > *pdev) {}
> >  
> >  static void set_dev_domain_options(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> >  {
> > -	if (is_vmd(pdev->bus))
> > +	if (is_vmd(pdev->bus)) {
> > +		struct pci_host_bridge *hb;
> > +		struct pci_dev *vmd;
> > +
> >  		pdev->hotplug_user_indicators = 1;
> > +
> > +		/*
> > +		 * The VMD endpoint is not PCIe, so will fail
> > +		 * pcie_aer_get_firmware_first(). Set and get the
> > raw member
> > +		 * instead.
> > +		 */
> > +		hb = pci_find_host_bridge(pdev->bus);
> > +		vmd = to_pci_dev(hb->dev.parent);
> > +
> > +		pdev->__aer_firmware_first = vmd-
> > >__aer_firmware_first;
> > +		pdev->__aer_firmware_first_valid = vmd-
> > >__aer_firmware_first_valid;
> > +	}
> >  }
> >  
> >  int pcibios_add_device(struct pci_dev *dev)
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > index fd2dbd7..74a1a04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c
> > @@ -44,6 +44,11 @@ enum vmd_features {
> >  	 * bus numbering
> >  	 */
> >  	VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS	= (1 << 1),
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Device may request firmware first error-handling on the
> > domain
> > +	 */
> > +	VMD_FEAT_HAS_FIRMWARE_FIRST	= (1 << 2),
> >  };
> >  
> >  /*
> > @@ -633,6 +638,23 @@ static int vmd_enable_domain(struct vmd_dev
> > *vmd, unsigned long features)
> >  			busn_start = 128;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Certain VMD devices may request firmware first error-
> > handling
> > +	 * support on the domain. These domains are virtual and
> > not described
> > +	 * by ACPI, so we must set it explicitly. This sets
> > firmware first on
> > +	 * the endpoint and has a corresponding domain setting in
> > +	 * arch/x86/pci/common.c
> > +	 */
> > +	if (features & VMD_FEAT_HAS_FIRMWARE_FIRST) {
> > +		u8 interface;
> > +
> > +		pci_read_config_byte(vmd->dev, PCI_CLASS_PROG,
> > &interface);
> > +		if (interface == 0x1) {
> 
> This test of the programming interface should have a spec reference
> so
> it doesn't look magical.
> 
> > +			vmd->dev->__aer_firmware_first = 1;
> > +			vmd->dev->__aer_firmware_first_valid = 1;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> >  	res = &vmd->dev->resource[VMD_CFGBAR];
> >  	vmd->resources[0] = (struct resource) {
> >  		.name  = "VMD CFGBAR",
> > @@ -860,7 +882,8 @@ static int vmd_resume(struct device *dev)
> >  	{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> > PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_201D),},
> >  	{PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL,
> > PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C0),
> >  		.driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW |
> > -				VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,},
> > +				VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS |
> > +				VMD_FEAT_HAS_FIRMWARE_FIRST,},
> 
> Why is this connected to specific hardware versions?  The non-VMD
> firmware-first functionality is determined by firmware, independent
> of
> any particular PCI device.
> 
> If there's a spec that says "programming interface 0x1 means
> something
> other than firmware-first" on some devices, you could cite it here.
> If early devices are an exception and programming interface will have
> a consistent meaning in the future, you might be able to invert this
> so you only have to mark the early devices instead of every new
> version.
> 
> >  	{0,}
> >  };
> >  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, vmd_ids);
> > -- 
> > 1.8.3.1
> > 

[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 3278 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2018-09-04 23:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-31  0:30 [PATCH] VMD firmware first Jon Derrick
2018-08-31  0:30 ` [PATCH] PCI/VMD: Set up firmware first if capable Jon Derrick
2018-08-31 14:47   ` Keith Busch
2018-09-04 13:08   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2018-09-04 23:04     ` Derrick, Jonathan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1536102260.14847.0.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jonathan.derrick@intel.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.