From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: stern@rowland.harvard.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "USB: remove LPM management from usb_driver_claim_interface()" added to usb-linus
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:49:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1537440595160241@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
USB: remove LPM management from usb_driver_claim_interface()
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
>From c183813fcee44a249339b7c46e1ad271ca1870aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 13:58:51 -0400
Subject: USB: remove LPM management from usb_driver_claim_interface()
usb_driver_claim_interface() disables and re-enables Link Power
Management, but it shouldn't do either one, for the reasons listed
below. This patch removes the two LPM-related function calls from the
routine.
The reason for disabling LPM in the analogous function
usb_probe_interface() is so that drivers won't have to deal with
unwanted LPM transitions in their probe routine. But
usb_driver_claim_interface() doesn't call the driver's probe routine
(or any other callbacks), so that reason doesn't apply here.
Furthermore, no driver other than usbfs will ever call
usb_driver_claim_interface() unless it is already bound to another
interface in the same device, which means disabling LPM here would be
redundant. usbfs doesn't interact with LPM at all.
Lastly, the error return from usb_unlocked_disable_lpm() isn't handled
properly; the code doesn't clean up its earlier actions before
returning.
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Fixes: 8306095fd2c1 ("USB: Disable USB 3.0 LPM in critical sections.")
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/core/driver.c | 15 ---------------
1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
index e76e95f62f76..7652dcb57998 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/core/driver.c
@@ -512,7 +512,6 @@ int usb_driver_claim_interface(struct usb_driver *driver,
struct device *dev;
struct usb_device *udev;
int retval = 0;
- int lpm_disable_error = -ENODEV;
if (!iface)
return -ENODEV;
@@ -533,16 +532,6 @@ int usb_driver_claim_interface(struct usb_driver *driver,
iface->condition = USB_INTERFACE_BOUND;
- /* See the comment about disabling LPM in usb_probe_interface(). */
- if (driver->disable_hub_initiated_lpm) {
- lpm_disable_error = usb_unlocked_disable_lpm(udev);
- if (lpm_disable_error) {
- dev_err(&iface->dev, "%s Failed to disable LPM for driver %s\n",
- __func__, driver->name);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
- }
-
/* Claimed interfaces are initially inactive (suspended) and
* runtime-PM-enabled, but only if the driver has autosuspend
* support. Otherwise they are marked active, to prevent the
@@ -561,10 +550,6 @@ int usb_driver_claim_interface(struct usb_driver *driver,
if (device_is_registered(dev))
retval = device_bind_driver(dev);
- /* Attempt to re-enable USB3 LPM, if the disable was successful. */
- if (!lpm_disable_error)
- usb_unlocked_enable_lpm(udev);
-
return retval;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(usb_driver_claim_interface);
--
2.19.0
reply other threads:[~2018-09-20 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1537440595160241@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.