diff for duplicates of <1538055102.3459.112.camel@linux.ibm.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 1e9469e..d4d5c30 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 17:52 +0530, Nayna Jain wrote: > rule is enabled, not the IMA-appraisal rule. The patch itself looks good, but this patch description explains -"what" the patch is doing, not "why". Missing is the motivation for +"what" the patch is doing, not "why". Missing is the motivation for the patch. Mimi diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 50b1ea6..cd83614 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ "> rule is enabled, not the IMA-appraisal rule.\n" "\n" "The patch itself looks good, but this patch description explains\n" - "\"what\" the patch is doing, not \"why\". \302\240Missing is the motivation for\n" + "\"what\" the patch is doing, not \"why\". Missing is the motivation for\n" "the patch.\n" "\n" "Mimi\n" @@ -109,4 +109,4 @@ "> \tbool \"IMA build time configured policy rules\"\n" "> \tdepends on IMA_APPRAISE && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS" -398dd167bcab35f962ebeb821af4f001a8e361a57ae7abcf9857213e0abf64a0 +d901e9265f98dfcbc6ec96c071197ed661670ae8f8019fbf280f2dcaad5e9978
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 1e9469e..14d0ed5 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ On Wed, 2018-09-26 at 17:52 +0530, Nayna Jain wrote: > rule is enabled, not the IMA-appraisal rule. The patch itself looks good, but this patch description explains -"what" the patch is doing, not "why". Missing is the motivation for +"what" the patch is doing, not "why". ?Missing is the motivation for the patch. Mimi diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 50b1ea6..01d46ca 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -1,16 +1,9 @@ "ref\020180926122210.14642-1-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" "ref\020180926122210.14642-7-nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0" - "From\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] x86/ima: define arch_get_ima_policy() for x86\0" + "From\0zohar@linux.ibm.com (Mimi Zohar)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v4 6/6] x86/ima: define arch_get_ima_policy() for x86\0" "Date\0Thu, 27 Sep 2018 09:31:42 -0400\0" - "To\0Nayna Jain <nayna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>" - " linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org\0" - "Cc\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" - linux-efi@vger.kernel.org - linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org - dhowells@redhat.com - jforbes@redhat.com - " Eric Richter <erichte@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0" + "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Hi Eric, Nayna,\n" @@ -26,7 +19,7 @@ "> rule is enabled, not the IMA-appraisal rule.\n" "\n" "The patch itself looks good, but this patch description explains\n" - "\"what\" the patch is doing, not \"why\". \302\240Missing is the motivation for\n" + "\"what\" the patch is doing, not \"why\". ?Missing is the motivation for\n" "the patch.\n" "\n" "Mimi\n" @@ -109,4 +102,4 @@ "> \tbool \"IMA build time configured policy rules\"\n" "> \tdepends on IMA_APPRAISE && INTEGRITY_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS" -398dd167bcab35f962ebeb821af4f001a8e361a57ae7abcf9857213e0abf64a0 +06bf4a13b025469df56557366bcaf87821fcb69f210414cb3be4d1fb26e4cfb5
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.