From: bvanassche@acm.org (Bart Van Assche)
Subject: [PATCH RFC] nvmet-rdma: use a private workqueue for delete
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2018 15:14:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1538172846.53591.8.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180927180031.10706-1-sagi@grimberg.me>
On Thu, 2018-09-27@11:00 -0700, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
> Queue deletion is done asynchronous when the last reference on
> the queue is dropped. Thus, in order to make sure we don't over
> allocate under a connect/disconnect storm, we let queue deletion
> complete before making forward progress.
>
> However, given that we flush the system_wq from rdma_cm context
> which runs from a workqueue context, we can have a circular
> locking complaint [1]. Fix that by using a private workqueue for
> queue deletion.
Hi Sagi,
Thanks for this patch. With this patch applied the warning I reported
earlier disappears but a new warning appeared:
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.19.0-rc5-dbg+ #8 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
kworker/u24:7/977 is trying to acquire lock:
000000003dc8471f (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}, at: rdma_destroy_id+0x6f/0x440 [rdma_cm]
but task is already holding lock:
0000000086ca5cb1 ((work_completion)(&queue->release_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x3ed/0xa20
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #3 ((work_completion)(&queue->release_work)){+.+.}:
process_one_work+0x474/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #2 ((wq_completion)"nvmet-rdma-delete-wq"){+.+.}:
flush_workqueue+0xf3/0x970
nvmet_rdma_cm_handler+0x1319/0x170f [nvmet_rdma]
cma_ib_req_handler+0x72f/0xf90 [rdma_cm]
cm_process_work+0x2e/0x110 [ib_cm]
cm_req_handler+0x135b/0x1c30 [ib_cm]
cm_work_handler+0x2b7/0x38cd [ib_cm]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #1 (&id_priv->handler_mutex/1){+.+.}:
__mutex_lock+0xfe/0xbe0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
cma_ib_req_handler+0x6aa/0xf90 [rdma_cm]
cm_process_work+0x2e/0x110 [ib_cm]
cm_req_handler+0x135b/0x1c30 [ib_cm]
cm_work_handler+0x2b7/0x38cd [ib_cm]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
-> #0 (&id_priv->handler_mutex){+.+.}:
lock_acquire+0xc5/0x200
__mutex_lock+0xfe/0xbe0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
rdma_destroy_id+0x6f/0x440 [rdma_cm]
nvmet_rdma_release_queue_work+0x8e/0x1b0 [nvmet_rdma]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&id_priv->handler_mutex --> (wq_completion)"nvmet-rdma-delete-wq" --> (work_completion)(&queue->release_work)
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock((work_completion)(&queue->release_work));
lock((wq_completion)"nvmet-rdma-delete-wq");
lock((work_completion)(&queue->release_work));
lock(&id_priv->handler_mutex);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by kworker/u24:7/977:
#0: 00000000148450ab ((wq_completion)"nvmet-rdma-delete-wq"){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x3ed/0xa20
#1: 0000000086ca5cb1 ((work_completion)(&queue->release_work)){+.+.}, at: process_one_work+0x3ed/0xa20
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 977 Comm: kworker/u24:7 Not tainted 4.19.0-rc5-dbg+ #8
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
Workqueue: nvmet-rdma-delete-wq nvmet_rdma_release_queue_work [nvmet_rdma]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x86/0xc5
print_circular_bug.isra.32+0x20a/0x218
__lock_acquire+0x1a54/0x1b20
lock_acquire+0xc5/0x200
__mutex_lock+0xfe/0xbe0
mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20
rdma_destroy_id+0x6f/0x440 [rdma_cm]
nvmet_rdma_release_queue_work+0x8e/0x1b0 [nvmet_rdma]
process_one_work+0x4ae/0xa20
worker_thread+0x63/0x5a0
kthread+0x1cf/0x1f0
ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-09-28 22:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-09-27 18:00 [PATCH RFC] nvmet-rdma: use a private workqueue for delete Sagi Grimberg
2018-09-28 22:14 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2018-10-01 20:12 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-02 15:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-05 7:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <CAO+b5-oBVw=-wvnWk1EF=RBaZtjX6bjUG+3WABXbvzX9UTu26w@mail.gmail.com>
2018-10-19 1:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-19 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-22 8:56 ` Johannes Berg
2018-10-22 21:17 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-23 19:18 ` Johannes Berg
2018-10-23 19:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2018-10-23 19:59 ` Johannes Berg
2018-10-23 20:00 ` Johannes Berg
2018-10-23 0:40 ` Sagi Grimberg
2018-10-23 19:22 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1538172846.53591.8.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.