From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([143.182.124.37]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1TFuk2-0000D0-Ho for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2012 00:33:34 +0200 Received: from azsmga001.ch.intel.com ([10.2.17.19]) by azsmga102.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2012 15:20:46 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,471,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="196111383" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.252]) by azsmga001.ch.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2012 15:20:45 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 23:20:44 +0100 Message-ID: <1540243.ihgQ8YivHP@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9.1 (Linux/3.2.0-31-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.1; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1348436710.4444.247.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> References: <1348436710.4444.247.camel@x121e.pbcl.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Phil Blundell Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel.bbclass: Allow modules.tar.gz generation to be inhibited X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 22:33:34 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday 23 September 2012 22:45:10 Phil Blundell wrote: > The modules.tar.gz archive is sometimes of no value and it can take > a noticeable time to build if many modules were enabled in the kernel > configuration. The extraneous file also contributes to deploy/ clutter > and is a waste of disk space. > > Allow it to be suppressed by setting KERNEL_DEPLOY_MODULE_TARBALL=0. I'm wondering, does anyone still find this file useful? Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre