From: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
To: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Simplify has_sagv
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:48:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1540252130.2734.44.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181022165744.11788-1-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Em Seg, 2018-10-22 às 09:57 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi escreveu:
> Let's add a platform has_sagv instead of having a full
> function that handle platform by platform.
>
> The specially case for SKL for not controlled sagv
> is already taken care inside intel_enable_sagv, so there's
> no need to duplicate the check here.
>
> v2: Go one step further and remove skl special case. (Jani)
>
> v3: Separate runtime status handle from has_sagv flag. (Jani)
I know this has probably been discussed in the past and I missed it
(since I know this was done a few times for other things), but how/why
is this approach better than the current one? Can you please write it
in the commit message?
Quickly checking the implementation of intel_has_sagv() seems much
easier than swimming through the nested macros of i915_pci.c. And the
special-caseness of the NOT_CONTROLLED case being restricted to gen9 in
the current (non-patched) code also at first appears to be better than
this proposal. But I'm totally willing to read your arguments and
reevaluate my decisions based on them, so please present them.
>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 29 ++++++++------------
> ----
> 4 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 3017ef037fed..9b98ceb2d029 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2650,6 +2650,7 @@ intel_info(const struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)
> #define HAS_DDI(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_ddi)
> #define HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)-
> >info.has_fpga_dbg)
> #define HAS_PSR(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_psr)
> +#define HAS_SAGV(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)-
> >info.has_sagv)
>
> #define HAS_RC6(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)->info.has_rc6)
> #define HAS_RC6p(dev_priv) ((dev_priv)-
> >info.has_rc6p)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 44e745921ac1..0b09155eab62 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -465,6 +465,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info
> intel_cherryview_info = {
> .has_csr = 1, \
> .has_guc = 1, \
> .has_ipc = 1, \
> + .has_sagv = 1, \
> .ddb_size = 896
>
> #define SKL_PLATFORM \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index af7002640cdf..e77c8b62783f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -117,6 +117,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt {
> func(hws_needs_physical); \
> func(overlay_needs_physical); \
> func(supports_tv); \
> + func(has_sagv); \
> func(has_ipc);
>
> #define GEN_MAX_SLICES (6) /* CNL upper bound */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 67a4d0735291..7e38ed8421c7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -3609,20 +3609,6 @@ static bool skl_needs_memory_bw_wa(struct
> intel_atomic_state *state)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool
> -intel_has_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
> -{
> - if (IS_KABYLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_COFFEELAKE(dev_priv) ||
> - IS_CANNONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv))
> - return true;
> -
> - if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) &&
> - dev_priv->sagv_status != I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
> - return true;
> -
> - return false;
> -}
> -
> /*
> * SAGV dynamically adjusts the system agent voltage and clock
> frequencies
> * depending on power and performance requirements. The display
> engine access
> @@ -3639,10 +3625,11 @@ intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> + if (!HAS_SAGV(dev_priv))
> return 0;
>
> - if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_ENABLED)
> + if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_ENABLED ||
> + dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
> return 0;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling the SAGV\n");
> @@ -3676,10 +3663,11 @@ intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private
> *dev_priv)
> {
> int ret;
>
> - if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> + if (!HAS_SAGV(dev_priv))
> return 0;
>
> - if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_DISABLED)
> + if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_DISABLED ||
> + dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
> return 0;
>
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling the SAGV\n");
> @@ -3721,7 +3709,10 @@ bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct
> drm_atomic_state *state)
> int level, latency;
> int sagv_block_time_us;
>
> - if (!intel_has_sagv(dev_priv))
> + if (!HAS_SAGV(dev_priv))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED)
> return false;
>
> if (IS_GEN9(dev_priv))
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-19 17:20 [PATCH] drm/i915: Simplify has_sagv Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-22 6:28 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-22 16:57 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-22 23:48 ` Paulo Zanoni [this message]
2018-10-23 0:06 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-23 0:32 ` Paulo Zanoni
2018-10-23 7:23 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-23 19:05 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-24 10:13 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-24 17:23 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-26 20:03 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Simplify has_sagv function Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-29 10:08 ` Jani Nikula
2018-10-29 18:58 ` Rodrigo Vivi
2018-10-22 13:13 ` ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for drm/i915: Simplify has_sagv Patchwork
2018-10-22 13:14 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2018-10-22 13:37 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-22 16:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
2018-10-22 17:20 ` ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: warning for drm/i915: Simplify has_sagv (rev2) Patchwork
2018-10-22 17:37 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-22 20:42 ` ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2018-10-26 21:21 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for drm/i915: Simplify has_sagv (rev3) Patchwork
2018-10-29 15:59 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2018-10-29 18:10 ` ✓ Fi.CI.IGT: " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1540252130.2734.44.camel@intel.com \
--to=paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.