From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: liu ping fan <qemulist@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mem: prepare address_space listener rcu style
Date: Wed, 15 May 2013 05:19:48 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <154112326.1807249.1368609588959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJnKYQnXjR5+pE3hVijCevHVCX0nYunibMwTZ4xgDVNLr+tYcw@mail.gmail.com>
> > > rcu_read_lock();
> > > map = rcu_dereference(d->cur_map)
> > > if (unlikely(d->prev_map!=map) {
> > > d->root = map->root;
> > > d->pgtbl = map->pgtbl;
> > > }
> > > ......
> > > rcu_read_unlock();
> > >
> > > Then it can avoid ABA problem.
> >
> > I don't see the assignment of prev_map, which is where the ABA problem
> > arises.
If you do this:
> rcu_read_lock();
> map = rcu_derefenrence(d->cur_map)
> if (unlikely(d->prev_map!=map) {
> d->root = map->root;
> d->pgtbl = map->pgtbl;
> d->prev_map = map;
> }
> ....
> rcu_read_unlock();
It can happen. The problem is that prev_map can change _after_
the rcu_read_unlock. It is the same as your previous solution.
Please just use the load-and-check idiom. I'll post my RCU
implementation as soon as I finish the documentation.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-15 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-13 3:21 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/2] make memory listener prepared for rcu style Liu Ping Fan
2013-05-13 3:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 1/2] mem: make phys_section and phys_map_nodes prepared for RCU Liu Ping Fan
2013-05-13 9:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-14 3:38 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-14 9:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-15 7:04 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-26 13:02 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-27 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-29 1:52 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-13 3:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 2/2] mem: prepare address_space listener rcu style Liu Ping Fan
2013-05-13 9:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-14 5:47 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-14 9:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-15 1:29 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-15 8:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-05-15 9:11 ` liu ping fan
2013-05-15 9:19 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-05-16 9:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=154112326.1807249.1368609588959.JavaMail.root@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemulist@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.