From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:43:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Add L2 cache topology to ARM Ltd boards/models In-Reply-To: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Message-ID: <1542574.d99bFx24pn@wuerfel> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wednesday 21 January 2015 12:02:30 Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi Arnd/Olof, > > Though this patch and commit 5d425c18653731af6 ("arm64: kernel: add > support for cpu cache information") which is in -next(via arm64) are > dependent to provide desired functionality, then can go indepedently > if you think there could be conflicts if this change is taken via arm64. > If not, Catalin can pick up with your acks after the review. I think it would be better to take this through arm-soc. It's not extremely likely to cause conflicts, but as you say there are no strict dependencies on which goes in first, so there is no harm in merging them separately. Arnd From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add L2 cache topology to ARM Ltd boards/models Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 15:43:23 +0100 Message-ID: <1542574.d99bFx24pn@wuerfel> References: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1421841750-26722-1-git-send-email-sudeep.holla-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Mark Rutland , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Catalin Marinas , Liviu Dudau , Olof Johansson List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 21 January 2015 12:02:30 Sudeep Holla wrote: > > Hi Arnd/Olof, > > Though this patch and commit 5d425c18653731af6 ("arm64: kernel: add > support for cpu cache information") which is in -next(via arm64) are > dependent to provide desired functionality, then can go indepedently > if you think there could be conflicts if this change is taken via arm64. > If not, Catalin can pick up with your acks after the review. I think it would be better to take this through arm-soc. It's not extremely likely to cause conflicts, but as you say there are no strict dependencies on which goes in first, so there is no harm in merging them separately. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html