All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@impinj.com>
To: "stefan@agner.ch" <stefan@agner.ch>,
	"l.stach@pengutronix.de" <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
	"leonard.crestez@nxp.com" <leonard.crestez@nxp.com>
Cc: "hongxing.zhu@nxp.com" <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"jingoohan1@gmail.com" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>,
	"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	"gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com" <gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com>,
	"andrew.smirnov@gmail.com" <andrew.smirnov@gmail.com>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"bhelgaas@google.com" <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: imx6: limit DBI register length
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:34:23 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1543250062.18519.34.camel@impinj.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ee74fde8e40a0ca40bd8b69755c9b0919f779b13.camel@nxp.com>

On Mon, 2018-11-26 at 10:16 +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 21:42 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > On 20.11.2018 20:13, Trent Piepho wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 18:19 +0000, Leonard Crestez wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2018-11-20 at 17:56 +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
> > > > > Define the length of the DBI registers. This makes sure that
> > > > > the kernel does not access registers beyond that point, avoiding
> > > > > the following abort on a i.MX 6Quad:
> > > > >   # cat
> > > > > /sys/devices/soc0/soc/1ffc000.pcie/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:00.0/config
> > > > >   [  100.021433] Unhandled fault: imprecise external abort (0x1406)
> > > > > at 0xb6ea7000
> > > > >   ...
> > > > >   [  100.056423] PC is at dw_pcie_read+0x50/0x84
> > > > >   [  100.060790] LR is at dw_pcie_rd_own_conf+0x44/0x48
> > > > 
> > > > I don't know exactly where this limitation comes from, I can indeed
> > > > reproduce a stack dump when dumping pci config from /sys/
> > > > 
> > > > Unfortunately this seems to block access to registers used for
> > > > functionality like interrupts. For example dw_handle_msi_irq does:
> > > > 
> > > > 	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_STATUS +
> > > > 			    (i * MSI_REG_CTRL_BLOCK_SIZE),
> > > > 			    4, &val);
> > > > 
> > > > where PCI_MSI_INTR0_STATUS is 0x830. There are more accesses like this.
> > > 
> > > On IMX7d, there are significant blocks of 00s in the config space, and
> > > all 0xff at 0xb50 on up.
> > > 
> > > I.e., significant portions are empty, in the middle of the config
> > > space, not just at the end.
> > > 
> > > But they can be read without problem.
> > > 
> > > Perhaps imx6q aborts on a read of an unimplemented address instead of
> > > returning zeros like imx7d.  In that case it really needs something
> > > more complex to prevent abort than just a length.
> > 
> > Yeah it seems those SoCs behave differently.
> > 
> > Describing a register set with holes will get complicated, I guess it
> > would ask for a regmap...
> 
> The PortLogic area seems to be always at 0x700-0xA00, there are defines
> for it. So this would only require one additional range, no regmap
> stuff.
> 
> I don't know if making portlogic accessible to userspace is useful. In
> theory somebody could read debug DWC registers via /sys/blah/config,
> but there are better ways to read HW registers from userspace.
> 
> Browsing through the docs I can't find stuff like reads with side-
> effects so I can't say that it's harmful either.

I doubt those register are used much from userspace, since AFAIK there
are no public docs for them.  I have dumped the config regs from
userspace in imx7d to debug a hang problem, but those registers weren't
useful to me.  Maybe they would have been, no docs...

> > > It also seems to me that this doesn't need to be in the internal pci
> > > config access functions.  The driver shouldn't be reading registers
> > > that don't exist anyway.  It's really about trying to fix sysfs access
> > > to registers that don't exist.  So maybe it should be done there.
> > 
> > That was my first approach
> 
> Doing it on a per-soc basis is better, this seems to affect both 6q and
> 6qp (those are distinct!) but not others.
> 
> The pci config area from userspace is accessed through pci_ops.read =
> dw_pcie_rd_conf while internal accesses go through dw_pcie_rd_own_conf.
> So moving the dbi_length check up one level would work easily.

What about something like:

static int dw_pcie_rd_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn, int where,
                           int size, u32 *val)
{
	struct pcie_port *pp = bus->sysdata;

	if (!dw_pcie_valid_device(pp, bus, PCI_SLOT(devfn))) {
		*val = 0xffffffff;
		return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND;
	}

	if (bus->number == pp->root_bus_nr) {
+		if (pp->ops->cfg_valid && !pp->ops_cfg_valid(pp, where, size)) {
+			*val = 0xffffffff;
+			return PCIBIOS_SOMETHING_GOES_HERE;
+		}
+
                return dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, where, size, val);
+	}
	return dw_pcie_rd_other_conf(pp, bus, devfn, where, size, val);
}

imx6q and imx6qp can provide cfg_valid that checks their range.

      reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26 16:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-20 16:56 [PATCH v3 1/2] PCI: imx6: introduce drvdata Stefan Agner
2018-11-20 16:56 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] PCI: imx6: limit DBI register length Stefan Agner
2018-11-20 18:19   ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-20 19:13     ` Trent Piepho
2018-11-20 20:42       ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-20 21:28         ` Trent Piepho
2018-11-21 13:47           ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-21 14:17             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-11-28 12:19             ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-28 17:36               ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-28 17:50                 ` Lucas Stach
2018-11-28 17:56                   ` Stefan Agner
2018-11-28 18:01                 ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-26 10:16         ` Leonard Crestez
2018-11-26 16:34           ` Trent Piepho [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1543250062.18519.34.camel@impinj.com \
    --to=tpiepho@impinj.com \
    --cc=andrew.smirnov@gmail.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=hongxing.zhu@nxp.com \
    --cc=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=leonard.crestez@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=stefan@agner.ch \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.