From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: 151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, alan@linux.intel.com,
ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: stable-commits@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Patch "x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 20:13:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <154472839566208@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
x86-uaccess-use-__uaccess_begin_nospec-and-uaccess_try_nospec.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Dec 13 20:11:30 CET 2018
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2018 17:02:49 -0800
Subject: x86/uaccess: Use __uaccess_begin_nospec() and uaccess_try_nospec
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
commit 304ec1b050310548db33063e567123fae8fd0301 upstream.
Quoting Linus:
I do think that it would be a good idea to very expressly document
the fact that it's not that the user access itself is unsafe. I do
agree that things like "get_user()" want to be protected, but not
because of any direct bugs or problems with get_user() and friends,
but simply because get_user() is an excellent source of a pointer
that is obviously controlled from a potentially attacking user
space. So it's a prime candidate for then finding _subsequent_
accesses that can then be used to perturb the cache.
__uaccess_begin_nospec() covers __get_user() and copy_from_iter() where the
limit check is far away from the user pointer de-reference. In those cases
a barrier_nospec() prevents speculation with a potential pointer to
privileged memory. uaccess_try_nospec covers get_user_try.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Suggested-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: alan@linux.intel.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
[bwh: Backported to 4.4:
- Convert several more functions to use __uaccess_begin_nospec(), that
are just wrappers in mainline
- Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h | 6 +++---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c | 10 +++++-----
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess.h
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@ do { \
({ \
int __gu_err; \
unsigned long __gu_val; \
- __uaccess_begin(); \
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec(); \
__get_user_size(__gu_val, (ptr), (size), __gu_err, -EFAULT); \
__uaccess_end(); \
(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val; \
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ struct __large_struct { unsigned long bu
* get_user_ex(...);
* } get_user_catch(err)
*/
-#define get_user_try uaccess_try
+#define get_user_try uaccess_try_nospec
#define get_user_catch(err) uaccess_catch(err)
#define get_user_ex(x, ptr) do { \
@@ -581,7 +581,7 @@ extern void __cmpxchg_wrong_size(void)
__typeof__(ptr) __uval = (uval); \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __old = (old); \
__typeof__(*(ptr)) __new = (new); \
- __uaccess_begin(); \
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec(); \
switch (size) { \
case 1: \
{ \
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_32.h
@@ -48,25 +48,25 @@ __copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *to,
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u8 *)from, (u8 __user *)to,
1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u16 *)from, (u16 __user *)to,
2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u32 *)from, (u32 __user *)to,
4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 8:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__put_user_size(*(u64 *)from, (u64 __user *)to,
8, ret, 8);
__uaccess_end();
@@ -111,17 +111,17 @@ __copy_from_user_inatomic(void *to, cons
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
@@ -162,17 +162,17 @@ __copy_from_user(void *to, const void __
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
@@ -190,17 +190,17 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long __c
switch (n) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u8 *)to, from, 1, ret, 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u16 *)to, from, 2, ret, 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_size(*(u32 *)to, from, 4, ret, 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -57,31 +57,31 @@ int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst,
return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size);
switch (size) {
case 1:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u8 *)dst, (u8 __user *)src,
ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 2:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u16 *)dst, (u16 __user *)src,
ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 4:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u32 *)dst, (u32 __user *)src,
ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 8:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 8);
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 10:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 10);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst,
__uaccess_end();
return ret;
case 16:
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(*(u64 *)dst, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 16);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
switch (size) {
case 1: {
u8 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u8 __user *)src,
ret, "b", "b", "=q", 1);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
}
case 2: {
u16 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u16 __user *)src,
ret, "w", "w", "=r", 2);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
case 4: {
u32 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u32 __user *)src,
ret, "l", "k", "=r", 4);
if (likely(!ret))
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, con
}
case 8: {
u64 tmp;
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
__get_user_asm(tmp, (u64 __user *)src,
ret, "q", "", "=r", 8);
if (likely(!ret))
--- a/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/lib/usercopy_32.c
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ do { \
unsigned long __copy_to_user_ll(void __user *to, const void *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user(to, from, n);
else
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_to_user_ll);
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user_zeroing(to, from, n);
else
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll);
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
if (movsl_is_ok(to, from, n))
__copy_user(to, from, n);
else
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nozero
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2)
n = __copy_user_zeroing_intel_nocache(to, from, n);
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__copy_from_user_ll_nocach
unsigned long __copy_from_user_ll_nocache_nozero(void *to, const void __user *from,
unsigned long n)
{
- __uaccess_begin();
+ __uaccess_begin_nospec();
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_USERCOPY
if (n > 64 && cpu_has_xmm2)
n = __copy_user_intel_nocache(to, from, n);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from dan.j.williams@intel.com are
queue-4.4/x86-introduce-__uaccess_begin_nospec-and-uaccess_try_nospec.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-vmx-emulate-msr_ia32_arch_capabilities.patch
queue-4.4/x86-usercopy-replace-open-coded-stac-clac-with-__uaccess_-begin-end.patch
queue-4.4/x86-uaccess-use-__uaccess_begin_nospec-and-uaccess_try_nospec.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-vmx-allow-direct-access-to-msr_ia32_spec_ctrl.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-x86-add-ibpb-support.patch
queue-4.4/kvm-svm-allow-direct-access-to-msr_ia32_spec_ctrl.patch
reply other threads:[~2018-12-13 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=154472839566208@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=151727416953.33451.10508284228526170604.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.