From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, luwei.kang@intel.com
Cc: robert.hu@intel.com, robert.hu@linux.intel.com, qemu-stable@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386: remove the 'INTEL_PT' CPUID bit from named CPU models
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 09:01:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1545440514.44118.11.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <faa89439-18ae-931b-54c7-212b7dea0e48@redhat.com>
On Fri, 2018-12-21 at 16:27 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 21/12/18 16:22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> > Hi Paolo,
> >
> > On 12/21/18 7:30 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > > From: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
> > >
> > > Processor tracing is not yet implemented for KVM and it will be
> > > an
> > > opt in feature requiring a special module parameter.
> > > Disable it, because it is wrong to enable it by default and
> > > it is impossible that no one has ever used it.
> > >
> > > Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org
> >
> > Does this patch misses Robert S-o-b?
> > Signed-off-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Paolo's right. It didn't come from me.
>
> No, the author is wrong, it should be me. "git commit -c" apparently
> copies the author from the original commit.
>
> Paolo
Hi Paolo, would you hold on INTEL_PT removal for a moment? I think I
need Luwei's double confirm.
(Added him in receiver list.)
>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > > ---
> > > target/i386/cpu.c | 8 +++-----
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/target/i386/cpu.c b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > index dae46f0319..9c54c41e7a 100644
> > > --- a/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > +++ b/target/i386/cpu.c
> > > @@ -2493,8 +2493,7 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[]
> > > = {
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMAP | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLWB |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512F | CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512DQ |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512BW | CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512CD |
> > > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512VL | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLFLUSHOPT |
> > > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_INTEL_PT,
> > > + CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512VL | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLFLUSHOPT,
> > > .features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] =
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_PKU | CPUID_7_0_ECX_OSPKE |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_AVX512VNNI,
> > > @@ -2546,7 +2545,7 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[]
> > > = {
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_HLE | CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX2 |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMEP |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_BMI2 | CPUID_7_0_EBX_ERMS |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_INVPCID |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_RTM | CPUID_7_0_EBX_RDSEED |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_ADX |
> > > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMAP | CPUID_7_0_EBX_INTEL_PT,
> > > + CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMAP,
> > > .features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] =
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_VBMI | CPUID_7_0_ECX_UMIP |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_PKU |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_OSPKE | CPUID_7_0_ECX_VBMI2 |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_GFNI |
> > > @@ -2604,8 +2603,7 @@ static X86CPUDefinition builtin_x86_defs[]
> > > = {
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_SMAP | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLWB |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512F | CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512DQ |
> > > CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512BW | CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512CD |
> > > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512VL | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLFLUSHOPT |
> > > - CPUID_7_0_EBX_INTEL_PT,
> > > + CPUID_7_0_EBX_AVX512VL | CPUID_7_0_EBX_CLFLUSHOPT,
> > > .features[FEAT_7_0_ECX] =
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_VBMI | CPUID_7_0_ECX_UMIP |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_PKU |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_OSPKE | CPUID_7_0_ECX_VBMI2 |
> > > CPUID_7_0_ECX_GFNI |
> > >
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-22 1:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-21 6:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386: remove the 'INTEL_PT' CPUID bit from named CPU models Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-21 15:22 ` Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
2018-12-21 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-22 1:01 ` Robert Hoo [this message]
2018-12-22 9:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-12-24 4:37 ` Robert Hoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1545440514.44118.11.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=philmd@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=robert.hu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.