From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com
Cc: linuxarm@huawei.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: Make protection lookup tables static
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2019 09:33:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1546882408.83374.14.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b269a676-8941-4de4-faed-c40ec0d0a45a@huawei.com>
On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 17:27 +0000, John Garry wrote:
> On 07/01/2019 16:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-07 at 22:41 +0800, John Garry wrote:
> > > Currently the protection lookup tables in sd_prot_flag_mask() and
> > > sd_prot_op() are declared non-static. As such, they will be rebuilt for
> > > each respective function call.
> > >
> > > Optimise by making them static.
> > >
> > > This saves ~100B object code for sd.c:
> > >
> > > Before:
> > > text data bss dec hex filename
> > > 25403 1024 16 26443 674b drivers/scsi/sd.o
> > >
> > > After:
> > > text data bss dec hex filename
> > > 25299 1024 16 26339 66e3 drivers/scsi/sd.o
> >
> > Since the sd_prot_op() function only has a single caller, please move it from sd.h
> > into sd.c.
>
> Can do, as long as no one has objection.
>
> Function sd_prot_flag_mask() also has a single caller AFAICS, so this
> could also be relocated.
Please move that function too from sd.h into sd.c.
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-07 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-07 14:41 [PATCH] scsi: sd: Make protection lookup tables static John Garry
2019-01-07 14:41 ` John Garry
2019-01-07 16:57 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-01-07 17:27 ` John Garry
2019-01-07 17:27 ` John Garry
2019-01-07 17:33 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1546882408.83374.14.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.