From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992E3E0141C for ; Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:57:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2012 06:57:02 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,453,1344236400"; d="scan'208";a="224591508" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.252.121.248]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2012 06:57:01 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Liu Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 14:57 +0100 Message-ID: <1546898.F9k85MPnqC@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.9 (Linux/3.2.0-30-generic-pae; KDE/4.9.0; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto Subject: Re: How to do the specified tasks instead of many default X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 13:57:02 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Thursday 20 September 2012 21:50:42 Liu wrote: > I know it probably not be right to do in such way.But my project is > built by buildroot,So I just need to run make to build the image.And now > I want to use bitbake to build the project instead of buildroot.Then I > think of the idea to use recipes to "do_fetch","do_unpack",and > "oe_runmake" to build the packages. I guess I would recommend if you're going to migrate to building with bitbake that you make more of a migration towards standard recipes - I'm not sure exactly where you will end up with your current approach but it sounds like you won't get much benefit by just calling into the original Buildroot makefiles over just continuing to use Buildroot on its own. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre