From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCA28C43612 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA6D2177E for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2019 22:55:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729864AbfAJWzu (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:55:50 -0500 Received: from manchmal.in-ulm.de ([217.10.9.201]:40882 "EHLO manchmal.in-ulm.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728668AbfAJWzt (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:55:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 23:55:45 +0100 From: Christoph Biedl To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Breno Leitao , Guenter Roeck , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 000/170] 4.19.14-stable review Message-ID: <1547160861@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> References: <20190107104452.953560660@linuxfoundation.org> <20190108230731.GC20519@roeck-us.net> <20190109143811.GB29274@kroah.com> <20190109194048.GA11505@roeck-us.net> <20190110065207.GA17195@kroah.com> <20190110131743.GE20217@kroah.com> <1547130295@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <1547133048@msgid.manchmal.in-ulm.de> <20190110154039.GA26814@roeck-us.net> <20190110182948.GB7748@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190110182948.GB7748@kroah.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote... > Ok, Breno and Christoph, what should I do here? Should I drop this > patch in the tree or add this new one? Ideally I can fix this soon as I > don't like having broken trees out there... Whatever Breno says - I don't feel competent enough to decide what's right here. Christoph