From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>,
Dave Neary <dneary@redhat.com>,
"O'Driscoll, Tim" <tim.odriscoll@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, users@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: Project Governance and Linux Foundation
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:27:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1547412.qzivax5BEW@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161018113401.GA5434@localhost.localdomain>
2016-10-18 17:04, Jerin Jacob:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:23:42PM -0400, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > I still hear concerns on this, and based on discussions with others who put their names to the post below, they do too. I think it's a perception that we need to address.
> >
> > I would say that there is still a perception issue, for companies who
> > look at the active developers, the owners of the project's resources
> > (infra, domain name), and who have heard anecdotal evidence of issues in
> > the past. I think the project has made a lot of progress since I have
> > been following it, and I do not believe there are any major issues with
> > the independence of the project. However, there are still concerned
> > parties on this front, and the concerns can be easily addressed by a
> > move to the LF.
>
> +1
How can we solve issues if you don't give more details than
"hear concerns" or "heard anecdotal evidence of issues"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-10 8:33 Project Governance and Linux Foundation O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-17 10:23 ` Hobywan Kenoby
2016-10-17 11:52 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-17 12:40 ` [dpdk-users] " Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-17 14:40 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-18 13:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-17 21:23 ` Dave Neary
2016-10-18 11:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-18 13:27 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2016-10-18 16:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-10-19 8:04 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2016-10-19 8:40 ` Dave Neary
2016-10-19 9:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-19 9:09 ` Jerin Jacob
[not found] ` <20161018121629630001294@chinamobile.com>
2016-10-18 10:29 ` [dpdk-users] How to printout PMD logs to console yingzhi
2016-10-18 10:58 ` Kavanagh, Mark B
2016-10-18 12:51 ` [dpdk-users] Project Governance and Linux Foundation Thomas Monjalon
2016-10-21 14:00 ` Dave Neary
2016-10-21 17:20 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-10-22 19:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-12 5:44 qin.chunhua
2016-10-12 7:43 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1547412.qzivax5BEW@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dneary@redhat.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=tim.odriscoll@intel.com \
--cc=users@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.