From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix sense handling in __scsi_execute()
Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:03:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1548288228.9266.74.camel@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190123224217.198935-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
On Wed, 2019-01-23 at 14:42 -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Since blk_execute_rq() no longer allocates a sense buffer and no longer
> initializes the sense pointer the callers of blk_execute_rq() have to do
> initialize the sense pointer. Hence this patch that initializes rq->sense
> and that removes a superfluous memcpy() statement.
>
> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.11+
> Fixes: 82ed4db499b8 ("block: split scsi_request out of struct request")
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> index 4feba3b5aff1..8b9f4b1bca35 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
> rq->cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(cmd[0]);
> memcpy(rq->cmd, cmd, rq->cmd_len);
> rq->retries = retries;
> + rq->sense = sense;
> req->timeout = timeout;
> req->cmd_flags |= flags;
> req->rq_flags |= rq_flags | RQF_QUIET;
> @@ -291,8 +292,6 @@ int __scsi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const unsigned char *cmd,
>
> if (resid)
> *resid = rq->resid_len;
> - if (sense && rq->sense_len)
> - memcpy(sense, rq->sense, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE);
> if (sshdr)
> scsi_normalize_sense(rq->sense, rq->sense_len, sshdr);
> ret = rq->result;
Please ignore this patch - I just realized that this is not the right way to
fix the issue I ran into.
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-24 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-23 22:42 [PATCH] Fix sense handling in __scsi_execute() Bart Van Assche
2019-01-24 0:03 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1548288228.9266.74.camel@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.