All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: vgupta@synopsys.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ARC: mm: do_page_fault fixes #1: relinquish mmap_sem if" failed to apply to 4.20-stable tree
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2019 16:07:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <15486016309156@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 4.20-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 4d447455e73b47c43dd35fcc38ed823d3182a474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2018 16:56:45 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] ARC: mm: do_page_fault fixes #1: relinquish mmap_sem if
 signal arrives while handle_mm_fault

do_page_fault() forgot to relinquish mmap_sem if a signal came while
handling handle_mm_fault() - due to say a ctl+c or oom etc.
This would later cause a deadlock by acquiring it twice.

This came to light when running libc testsuite tst-tls3-malloc test but
is likely also the cause for prior seen LTP failures. Using lockdep
clearly showed what the issue was.

| # while true; do ./tst-tls3-malloc ; done
| Didn't expect signal from child: got `Segmentation fault'
| ^C
| ============================================
| WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
| 4.17.0+ #25 Not tainted
| --------------------------------------------
| tst-tls3-malloc/510 is trying to acquire lock:
| 606c7728 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: __might_fault+0x28/0x5c
|
|but task is already holding lock:
|606c7728 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: do_page_fault+0x9c/0x2a0
|
| other info that might help us debug this:
|  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
|
|       CPU0
|       ----
|  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
|  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
|
| *** DEADLOCK ***
|

------------------------------------------------------------
What the change does is not obvious (note to myself)

prior code was

| do_page_fault
|
|   down_read()		<-- lock taken
|   handle_mm_fault	<-- signal pending as this runs
|   if fatal_signal_pending
|       if VM_FAULT_ERROR
|           up_read
|       if user_mode
|          return	<-- lock still held, this was the BUG

New code

| do_page_fault
|
|   down_read()		<-- lock taken
|   handle_mm_fault	<-- signal pending as this runs
|   if fatal_signal_pending
|       if VM_FAULT_RETRY
|          return       <-- not same case as above, but still OK since
|                           core mm already relinq lock for FAULT_RETRY
|    ...
|
|   < Now falls through for bug case above >
|
|   up_read()		<-- lock relinquished

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

diff --git a/arch/arc/mm/fault.c b/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
index a1d723197084..8df1638259f3 100644
--- a/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arc/mm/fault.c
@@ -141,12 +141,17 @@ void do_page_fault(unsigned long address, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	 */
 	fault = handle_mm_fault(vma, address, flags);
 
-	/* If Pagefault was interrupted by SIGKILL, exit page fault "early" */
 	if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
-		if ((fault & VM_FAULT_ERROR) && !(fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY))
-			up_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
-		if (user_mode(regs))
+
+		/*
+		 * if fault retry, mmap_sem already relinquished by core mm
+		 * so OK to return to user mode (with signal handled first)
+		 */
+		if (fault & VM_FAULT_RETRY) {
+			if (!user_mode(regs))
+				goto no_context;
 			return;
+		}
 	}
 
 	perf_sw_event(PERF_COUNT_SW_PAGE_FAULTS, 1, regs, address);


                 reply	other threads:[~2019-01-27 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=15486016309156@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vgupta@synopsys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.