From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXNd1-0007Br-6R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:08:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXNcw-0003EN-Ti for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:08:38 -0400 Received: from mx4-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.25]:48181) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bXNcw-0003DV-KK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:08:34 -0400 Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 03:08:33 -0400 (EDT) From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1550519450.770774.1470812913274.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <874m6t5d39.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> References: <1470757664-25161-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1470757664-25161-3-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <874m6t5d39.fsf@dusky.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] checkpatch: bump most warnings to errors List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, thuth@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com > Paolo Bonzini writes: > > > This only leaves a warning-level message for extra-long lines, which > > are relatively common and cause patchew to send email that will likely > > be ignored. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > > Are we ready to give up on illegibly long lines? We have other levels of code review than checkpatch. 80 chars can be illegibly short in some circumstances where 83 or 84 are enough. Paolo > What happened to "[PATCH 2/4] CODING_STYLE, checkpatch: update line > length rules"?