All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Cc: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>,
	julien.grall@arm.com, sstabellini@kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] xen/arm: keep track of reserved-memory regions
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 15:07:05 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1551222427-21749-4-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1902261501020.20689@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260>

As we parse the device tree in Xen, keep track of the reserved-memory
regions as they need special treatment (follow-up patches will make use
of the stored information.)

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
---
 xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c      | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h |  1 +
 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
index 44af11c..a86b1b3 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/bootfdt.c
@@ -163,6 +163,76 @@ static void __init process_memory_node(const void *fdt, int node,
     }
 }
 
+static void __init process_reserved_memory_node(const void *fdt,
+                                                int node,
+                                                int depth,
+                                                const char *name,
+                                                u32 as,
+                                                u32 ss)
+{
+    const struct fdt_property *prop;
+    int i;
+    int banks;
+    const __be32 *cell;
+    paddr_t start, size;
+    u32 reg_cells;
+    u32 address_cells[DEVICE_TREE_MAX_DEPTH];
+    u32 size_cells[DEVICE_TREE_MAX_DEPTH];
+
+    address_cells[depth] = as;
+    size_cells[depth] = ss;
+    node = fdt_next_node(fdt, node, &depth);
+
+    for ( ; node >= 0 && depth > 1;
+            node = fdt_next_node(fdt, node, &depth) )
+    {
+        name = fdt_get_name(fdt, node, NULL);
+
+        if ( depth >= DEVICE_TREE_MAX_DEPTH )
+        {
+            printk("Warning: device tree node `%s' is nested too deep\n",
+                   name);
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        address_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node,
+                                                   "#address-cells",
+                                                   address_cells[depth-1]);
+        size_cells[depth] = device_tree_get_u32(fdt, node,
+                                                "#size-cells",
+                                                size_cells[depth-1]);
+        if ( address_cells[depth-1] < 1 || size_cells[depth-1] < 1 )
+        {
+            printk("fdt: node `%s': invalid #address-cells or #size-cells",
+                    name);
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        prop = fdt_get_property(fdt, node, "reg", NULL);
+        if ( !prop )
+        {
+            printk("fdt: node `%s': missing `reg' property\n", name);
+            continue;
+        }
+
+        reg_cells = address_cells[depth-1] + size_cells[depth-1];
+        cell = (const __be32 *)prop->data;
+        banks = fdt32_to_cpu(prop->len) / (reg_cells * sizeof (u32));
+
+        for ( i = 0; i < banks && bootinfo.reserved_mem.nr_banks < NR_MEM_BANKS; i++ )
+        {
+            device_tree_get_reg(&cell, address_cells[depth-1], size_cells[depth-1],
+                                &start, &size);
+            if ( !size )
+                continue;
+
+            bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[bootinfo.reserved_mem.nr_banks].start = start;
+            bootinfo.reserved_mem.bank[bootinfo.reserved_mem.nr_banks].size = size;
+            bootinfo.reserved_mem.nr_banks++;
+        }
+    }
+}
+
 static void __init process_multiboot_node(const void *fdt, int node,
                                           const char *name,
                                           u32 address_cells, u32 size_cells)
@@ -286,6 +356,9 @@ static int __init early_scan_node(const void *fdt,
 {
     if ( device_tree_node_matches(fdt, node, "memory") )
         process_memory_node(fdt, node, name, address_cells, size_cells);
+    else if ( device_tree_node_matches(fdt, node, "reserved-memory") )
+        process_reserved_memory_node(fdt, node, depth, name,
+                                     address_cells, size_cells);
     else if ( device_tree_node_compatible(fdt, node, "xen,multiboot-module" ) ||
               device_tree_node_compatible(fdt, node, "multiboot,module" ))
         process_multiboot_node(fdt, node, name, address_cells, size_cells);
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h
index 11e1b2a..18eca89 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/setup.h
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ struct bootmodules {
 
 struct bootinfo {
     struct meminfo mem;
+    struct meminfo reserved_mem;
     struct bootmodules modules;
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
     struct meminfo acpi;
-- 
1.9.1


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-26 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-26 23:06 [PATCH 0/6] iomem cacheability Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-26 23:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] xen: extend XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping to handle cacheability Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-26 23:18   ` Julien Grall
2019-04-20  0:02     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-20  0:02       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-21 17:32       ` Julien Grall
2019-04-21 17:32         ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-22 21:59         ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-22 21:59           ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-24 10:42           ` Julien Grall
2019-04-24 10:42             ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-02-27 10:34   ` Jan Beulich
2019-04-17 21:12     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-17 21:12       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-17 21:25       ` Julien Grall
2019-04-17 21:25         ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-17 21:55         ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-17 21:55           ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-25 10:41       ` Jan Beulich
2019-04-25 10:41         ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-04-25 22:31         ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-25 22:31           ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-26  7:12           ` Jan Beulich
2019-04-26  7:12             ` [Xen-devel] " Jan Beulich
2019-02-27 19:28   ` Julien Grall
2019-04-19 23:20     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-19 23:20       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-21 17:14       ` Julien Grall
2019-04-21 17:14         ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-22 17:33         ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-22 17:33           ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-22 17:42           ` Julien Grall
2019-04-22 17:42             ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-02-27 21:02   ` Julien Grall
2019-02-26 23:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] libxc: xc_domain_memory_mapping, " Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-26 23:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] libxl/xl: add cacheability option to iomem Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-27 20:02   ` Julien Grall
2019-04-19 23:13     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-19 23:13       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-26 23:07 ` Stefano Stabellini [this message]
2019-02-28 14:38   ` [PATCH 4/6] xen/arm: keep track of reserved-memory regions Julien Grall
2019-02-26 23:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] xen/arm: map reserved-memory regions as normal memory in dom0 Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-26 23:45   ` Julien Grall
2019-04-22 22:42     ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-22 22:42       ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-23  8:09       ` Julien Grall
2019-04-23  8:09         ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-23 17:32         ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-23 17:32           ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-23 18:37           ` Julien Grall
2019-04-23 18:37             ` [Xen-devel] " Julien Grall
2019-04-23 21:34             ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-04-23 21:34               ` [Xen-devel] " Stefano Stabellini
2019-02-26 23:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] xen/docs: how to map a page between dom0 and domU using iomem Stefano Stabellini
2019-03-03 17:20 ` [PATCH 0/6] iomem cacheability Amit Tomer
2019-03-05 21:22   ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-03-05 22:45     ` Julien Grall
2019-03-06 11:46       ` Amit Tomer
2019-03-06 22:42         ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-03-06 22:59           ` Julien Grall
2019-03-07  8:42             ` Amit Tomer
2019-03-07 10:04               ` Julien Grall
2019-03-07 21:24                 ` Stefano Stabellini
2019-03-08 10:10                   ` Amit Tomer
2019-03-08 16:37                     ` Julien Grall
2019-03-08 17:44                       ` Amit Tomer
2019-03-06 11:30     ` Amit Tomer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1551222427-21749-4-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --to=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=stefanos@xilinx.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.