From: Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@gmail.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/CPU: Remove {get,set}Cx86_old macros used for Cyrix processors
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 16:46:01 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552596361-8967-3-git-send-email-tedheadster@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1552596361-8967-1-git-send-email-tedheadster@gmail.com>
The getCx86_old() and setCx86_old() macros have been replaced with
correctly working getCx86() and setCx86(), so remove these unused macros.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Whitehead <tedheadster@gmail.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h | 21 ---------------------
1 file changed, 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h
index aaedd73..df700a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor-cyrix.h
@@ -3,19 +3,6 @@
* NSC/Cyrix CPU indexed register access. Must be inlined instead of
* macros to ensure correct access ordering
* Access order is always 0x22 (=offset), 0x23 (=value)
- *
- * When using the old macros a line like
- * setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
- * gets expanded to:
- * do {
- * outb((CX86_CCR2), 0x22);
- * outb((({
- * outb((CX86_CCR2), 0x22);
- * inb(0x23);
- * }) | 0x88), 0x23);
- * } while (0);
- *
- * which in fact violates the access order (= 0x22, 0x22, 0x23, 0x23).
*/
static inline u8 getCx86(u8 reg)
@@ -29,11 +16,3 @@ static inline void setCx86(u8 reg, u8 data)
outb(reg, 0x22);
outb(data, 0x23);
}
-
-#define getCx86_old(reg) ({ outb((reg), 0x22); inb(0x23); })
-
-#define setCx86_old(reg, data) do { \
- outb((reg), 0x22); \
- outb((data), 0x23); \
-} while (0)
-
--
1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-14 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-14 20:45 [PATCH 0/2] x86/CPU: Use correct Cyrix-specific macros Matthew Whitehead
2019-03-14 20:46 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/CPU: Use correct macros for Cyrix calls on Geode processors Matthew Whitehead
2019-03-21 11:40 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpu/cyrix: " tip-bot for Matthew Whitehead
2019-03-14 20:46 ` Matthew Whitehead [this message]
2019-03-21 11:40 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86/cpu/cyrix: Remove {get,set}Cx86_old macros used for Cyrix processors tip-bot for Matthew Whitehead
2019-03-16 19:00 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86/CPU: Use correct Cyrix-specific macros Andy Lutomirski
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-06 20:49 Matthew Whitehead
2019-03-06 20:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/CPU: Remove {get,set}Cx86_old macros used for Cyrix processors Matthew Whitehead
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1552596361-8967-3-git-send-email-tedheadster@gmail.com \
--to=tedheadster@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.