All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com,
	Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf annotate/report: Remove hist__account_cycles from callback
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 21:46:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1552657561-15744-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com> (raw)

The hist__account_cycles is executed when the hist_iter__branch_callback
is called. But it looks it's not necessary. In hist__account_cycles, it
already walks on all branch entries.

This patch moves the hist__account_cycles out of callback, now the data
processing is much faster than before.

Previous code has an issue that the ch[offset].num++
(in __symbol__account_cycles) is executed repeatedly since
hist__account_cycles is called in each hist_iter__branch_callback,
so the counting of ch[offset].num is not correct (too big).
With this patch, the issue is fixed. And we don't need the code of
"ch->reset >= ch->num / 2" to check if there are too many overlaps
(in annotation__count_and_fill), otherwise some data would be
hidden.

Now, we can try, for example:

perf record -b ...
perf annotate or perf report -s symbol

The before/after output should be no change.

 v2:
 ---
 1. Cover the similar perf report
 2. Remove the checking code "ch->reset >= ch->num / 2"

Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c | 4 ++--
 tools/perf/builtin-report.c   | 9 +++------
 tools/perf/util/annotate.c    | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
index 67f9d9f..77deb3a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-annotate.c
@@ -159,8 +159,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	struct perf_evsel *evsel = iter->evsel;
 	int err;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
-
 	bi = he->branch_info;
 	err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
 
@@ -199,6 +197,8 @@ static int process_branch_callback(struct perf_evsel *evsel,
 	if (a.map != NULL)
 		a.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
+	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample, false);
+
 	ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &a, PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH, ann);
 	return ret;
 }
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
index 1921aaa..80874fa 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
@@ -136,9 +136,6 @@ static int hist_iter__report_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
 		return 0;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
 	if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
 		bi = he->branch_info;
 		err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
@@ -181,9 +178,6 @@ static int hist_iter__branch_callback(struct hist_entry_iter *iter,
 	if (!ui__has_annotation() && !rep->symbol_ipc)
 		return 0;
 
-	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, al, sample,
-			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
-
 	bi = he->branch_info;
 	err = addr_map_symbol__inc_samples(&bi->from, sample, evsel);
 	if (err)
@@ -282,6 +276,9 @@ static int process_sample_event(struct perf_tool *tool,
 	if (al.map != NULL)
 		al.map->dso->hit = 1;
 
+	hist__account_cycles(sample->branch_stack, &al, sample,
+			     rep->nonany_branch_mode);
+
 	ret = hist_entry_iter__add(&iter, &al, rep->max_stack, rep);
 	if (ret < 0)
 		pr_debug("problem adding hist entry, skipping event\n");
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
index 5f6dbbf..e8080c0 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/annotate.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static void annotation__count_and_fill(struct annotation *notes, u64 start, u64
 		float ipc = n_insn / ((double)ch->cycles / (double)ch->num);
 
 		/* Hide data when there are too many overlaps. */
-		if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff || ch->reset >= ch->num / 2)
+		if (ch->reset >= 0x7fff)
 			return;
 
 		for (offset = start; offset <= end; offset++) {
-- 
2.7.4


             reply	other threads:[~2019-03-15  5:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-15 13:46 Jin Yao [this message]
2019-03-15 12:54 ` [PATCH v2] perf annotate/report: Remove hist__account_cycles from callback Jiri Olsa
2019-03-15 13:12   ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1552657561-15744-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.