From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68EAC04AB1 for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:55:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF012085A for ; Thu, 9 May 2019 17:55:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1557424540; bh=b6bH73QG2Uk9ewtC5icQyncMFovKVxEGskosKxuwxRI=; h=Subject:To:Cc:From:Date:List-ID:From; b=gBShkJFgEkpwBhzzUvWp66BAtULf0uek+qkI2kK088aHN8bb7RO4hvDknhvFSIvxW FeXuJw4x/PBgKHcH830KOuwZmgSScwxKTVKjbSsb+wdrJbJJCrOL0LZ5gN64emcZR+ Z4OW+8ixeG6h7sqXLDcfoT1/VFxQaXLTtDLW0U68= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726708AbfEIRzk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 13:55:40 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:59155 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726632AbfEIRzj (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 May 2019 13:55:39 -0400 Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4550025AD1; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:55:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 09 May 2019 13:55:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pK8qDM SWi5nHwb//Lf3EFkn8mtmggMDlSzi18ezy1QE=; b=48nb/43p/sRxIxtaaK63Ns M/sAixmhyDN+vjcjknTDahxVZqJqs5mFPYvEk84dMfDxJB8NJPEv9h1cpNtkATN5 T+oBZWEAcU1+RD8/88UWh7PmGInmROtE0nq2sSnElo30/U7r9aK/FyKh0uuE4gNv NXu9GJT0kXn5yqHpkzCULHswfoHiOjU/nrlFCYRHoNvNJd3A+LqRJte0fnY/7VmS o7RJ1pCfMGrFdVtz3C4/s3/RlEJo+opuk2z6FqOW600RDYg11VCqh3Lb+cKpb6Nh 1NcsrUKh3TXzxMDIjDYoha5mbZeygnyY/RwkJb6ygIBQoA5kQjSb0Gy4lSE0+77g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduuddrkeeigdehkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepuffvhfffkfggtgfgsehtkeertddttd flnecuhfhrohhmpeeoghhrvghgkhhhsehlihhnuhigfhhouhhnuggrthhiohhnrdhorhhg qeenucfkphepkeefrdekiedrkeelrddutdejnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpe hgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 9F9EA80066; Thu, 9 May 2019 13:55:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero" failed to apply to 4.14-stable tree To: will.deacon@arm.com, stable@kernel.org Cc: From: Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 19:55:35 +0200 Message-ID: <1557424535198181@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ANSI_X3.4-1968 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org The patch below does not apply to the 4.14-stable tree. If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit id to . thanks, greg k-h ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ >From 84ff7a09c371bc7417eabfda19bf7f113ec917b6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:45:09 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: futex: Fix FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic ops with non-zero result value Rather embarrassingly, our futex() FUTEX_WAKE_OP implementation doesn't explicitly set the return value on the non-faulting path and instead leaves it holding the result of the underlying atomic operation. This means that any FUTEX_WAKE_OP atomic operation which computes a non-zero value will be reported as having failed. Regrettably, I wrote the buggy code back in 2011 and it was upstreamed as part of the initial arm64 support in 2012. The reasons we appear to get away with this are: 1. FUTEX_WAKE_OP is rarely used and therefore doesn't appear to get exercised by futex() test applications 2. If the result of the atomic operation is zero, the system call behaves correctly 3. Prior to version 2.25, the only operation used by GLIBC set the futex to zero, and therefore worked as expected. From 2.25 onwards, FUTEX_WAKE_OP is not used by GLIBC at all. Fix the implementation by ensuring that the return value is either 0 to indicate that the atomic operation completed successfully, or -EFAULT if we encountered a fault when accessing the user mapping. Cc: Fixes: 6170a97460db ("arm64: Atomic operations") Signed-off-by: Will Deacon diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h index cccb83ad7fa8..e1d95f08f8e1 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/futex.h @@ -30,8 +30,8 @@ do { \ " prfm pstl1strm, %2\n" \ "1: ldxr %w1, %2\n" \ insn "\n" \ -"2: stlxr %w3, %w0, %2\n" \ -" cbnz %w3, 1b\n" \ +"2: stlxr %w0, %w3, %2\n" \ +" cbnz %w0, 1b\n" \ " dmb ish\n" \ "3:\n" \ " .pushsection .fixup,\"ax\"\n" \ @@ -50,30 +50,30 @@ do { \ static inline int arch_futex_atomic_op_inuser(int op, int oparg, int *oval, u32 __user *_uaddr) { - int oldval = 0, ret, tmp; + int oldval, ret, tmp; u32 __user *uaddr = __uaccess_mask_ptr(_uaddr); pagefault_disable(); switch (op) { case FUTEX_OP_SET: - __futex_atomic_op("mov %w0, %w4", + __futex_atomic_op("mov %w3, %w4", ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, oparg); break; case FUTEX_OP_ADD: - __futex_atomic_op("add %w0, %w1, %w4", + __futex_atomic_op("add %w3, %w1, %w4", ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, oparg); break; case FUTEX_OP_OR: - __futex_atomic_op("orr %w0, %w1, %w4", + __futex_atomic_op("orr %w3, %w1, %w4", ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, oparg); break; case FUTEX_OP_ANDN: - __futex_atomic_op("and %w0, %w1, %w4", + __futex_atomic_op("and %w3, %w1, %w4", ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, ~oparg); break; case FUTEX_OP_XOR: - __futex_atomic_op("eor %w0, %w1, %w4", + __futex_atomic_op("eor %w3, %w1, %w4", ret, oldval, uaddr, tmp, oparg); break; default: