From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: carsten_schmid@mentor.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "usb: xhci: avoid null pointer deref when bos field is NULL" added to usb-linus
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:27:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1558528048145210@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
usb: xhci: avoid null pointer deref when bos field is NULL
to my usb git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git
in the usb-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 7aa1bb2ffd84d6b9b5f546b079bb15cd0ab6e76e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carsten Schmid <carsten_schmid@mentor.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2019 14:33:59 +0300
Subject: usb: xhci: avoid null pointer deref when bos field is NULL
With defective USB sticks we see the following error happen:
usb 1-3: new high-speed USB device number 6 using xhci_hcd
usb 1-3: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-3: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-3: new high-speed USB device number 7 using xhci_hcd
usb 1-3: device descriptor read/64, error -71
usb 1-3: unable to get BOS descriptor set
usb 1-3: New USB device found, idVendor=0781, idProduct=5581
usb 1-3: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
...
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000008
This comes from the following place:
[ 1660.215380] IP: xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm+0xdf/0x3d0 [xhci_hcd]
[ 1660.222092] PGD 0 P4D 0
[ 1660.224918] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
[ 1660.425520] CPU: 1 PID: 38 Comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: P U W O 4.14.67-apl #1
[ 1660.434277] Workqueue: usb_hub_wq hub_event [usbcore]
[ 1660.439918] task: ffffa295b6ae4c80 task.stack: ffffad4580150000
[ 1660.446532] RIP: 0010:xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm+0xdf/0x3d0 [xhci_hcd]
[ 1660.453821] RSP: 0018:ffffad4580153c70 EFLAGS: 00010046
[ 1660.459655] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffa295b4d7c000 RCX: 0000000000000002
[ 1660.467625] RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: ffffffff984a55b2 RDI: ffffffff984a55b2
[ 1660.475586] RBP: ffffad4580153cc8 R08: 0000000000d6520a R09: 0000000000000001
[ 1660.483556] R10: ffffad4580a004a0 R11: 0000000000000286 R12: ffffa295b4d7c000
[ 1660.491525] R13: 0000000000010648 R14: ffffa295a84e1800 R15: 0000000000000000
[ 1660.499494] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffa295bfc80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 1660.508530] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 1660.514947] CR2: 0000000000000008 CR3: 000000025a114000 CR4: 00000000003406a0
[ 1660.522917] Call Trace:
[ 1660.525657] usb_set_usb2_hardware_lpm+0x3d/0x70 [usbcore]
[ 1660.531792] usb_disable_device+0x242/0x260 [usbcore]
[ 1660.537439] usb_disconnect+0xc1/0x2b0 [usbcore]
[ 1660.542600] hub_event+0x596/0x18f0 [usbcore]
[ 1660.547467] ? trace_preempt_on+0xdf/0x100
[ 1660.552040] ? process_one_work+0x1c1/0x410
[ 1660.556708] process_one_work+0x1d2/0x410
[ 1660.561184] ? preempt_count_add.part.3+0x21/0x60
[ 1660.566436] worker_thread+0x2d/0x3f0
[ 1660.570522] kthread+0x122/0x140
[ 1660.574123] ? process_one_work+0x410/0x410
[ 1660.578792] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x60/0x60
[ 1660.583849] ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50
[ 1660.587839] Code: 00 49 89 c3 49 8b 84 24 50 16 00 00 8d 4a ff 48 8d 04 c8 48 89 ca 4c 8b 10 45 8b 6a 04 48 8b 00 48 89 45 c0 49 8b 86 80 03 00 00 <48> 8b 40 08 8b 40 03 0f 1f 44 00 00 45 85 ff 0f 84 81 01 00 00
[ 1660.608980] RIP: xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm+0xdf/0x3d0 [xhci_hcd] RSP: ffffad4580153c70
[ 1660.617921] CR2: 0000000000000008
Tracking this down shows that udev->bos is NULL in the following code:
(xhci.c, in xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm)
field = le32_to_cpu(udev->bos->ext_cap->bmAttributes); <<<<<<< here
xhci_dbg(xhci, "%s port %d USB2 hardware LPM\n",
enable ? "enable" : "disable", port_num + 1);
if (enable) {
/* Host supports BESL timeout instead of HIRD */
if (udev->usb2_hw_lpm_besl_capable) {
/* if device doesn't have a preferred BESL value use a
* default one which works with mixed HIRD and BESL
* systems. See XHCI_DEFAULT_BESL definition in xhci.h
*/
if ((field & USB_BESL_SUPPORT) &&
(field & USB_BESL_BASELINE_VALID))
hird = USB_GET_BESL_BASELINE(field);
else
hird = udev->l1_params.besl;
The failing case is when disabling LPM. So it is sufficient to avoid
access to udev->bos by moving the instruction into the "enable" clause.
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Carsten Schmid <carsten_schmid@mentor.com>
Signed-off-by: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
index a9bb796794e3..048a675bbc52 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
@@ -4320,7 +4320,6 @@ static int xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
pm_addr = ports[port_num]->addr + PORTPMSC;
pm_val = readl(pm_addr);
hlpm_addr = ports[port_num]->addr + PORTHLPMC;
- field = le32_to_cpu(udev->bos->ext_cap->bmAttributes);
xhci_dbg(xhci, "%s port %d USB2 hardware LPM\n",
enable ? "enable" : "disable", port_num + 1);
@@ -4332,6 +4331,7 @@ static int xhci_set_usb2_hardware_lpm(struct usb_hcd *hcd,
* default one which works with mixed HIRD and BESL
* systems. See XHCI_DEFAULT_BESL definition in xhci.h
*/
+ field = le32_to_cpu(udev->bos->ext_cap->bmAttributes);
if ((field & USB_BESL_SUPPORT) &&
(field & USB_BESL_BASELINE_VALID))
hird = USB_GET_BESL_BASELINE(field);
--
2.21.0
reply other threads:[~2019-05-22 12:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1558528048145210@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=carsten_schmid@mentor.com \
--cc=mathias.nyman@linux.intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.