From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3851919987225498872==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Gix, Brian Subject: Re: [PATCH] cipher: add AES-CMAC hashing support Date: Wed, 29 May 2019 03:25:04 +0000 Message-ID: <1559100302.25030.14.camel@intel.com> In-Reply-To: List-Id: To: ell@lists.01.org --===============3851919987225498872== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Denis, It does work, Thanks. I will probably do one patch anyway, to add a couple tests to test-checksum= .c, because currently a unit test for l_checksum_new_cmac_aes() is conspicuous in it's absence. On Wed, 2019-05-29 at 03:04 +0000, Gix, Brian wrote: > Hi Denis, > = > > On May 28, 2019, at 6:32 PM, Denis Kenzior wrote: > > = > > Hi Brian, > > = > > > On 05/28/2019 07:49 PM, Brian Gix wrote: > > > The algorythm is supported in the kernel, and it is used heavily by > > > Bluetooth Mesh, and is the one Mesh required algorythm missing from E= LL. > > > --- > > > ell/cipher.c | 88 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++++ > > > ell/cipher.h | 16 ++++++++++ > > > unit/test-cipher.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 3 files changed, 178 insertions(+) > > = > > Please be aware of our patch submission guidelines found in HACKING. E.= g. the unit test should be in a > > separate commit. > > = > > Have you checked whether l_checksum_new_cmac_aes() satisfies your needs? > = > I didn=E2=80=99t see that. I will check it out, and if it works, I will w= ithdraw my patch altogether. If it does not > work, I will resubmit as a patch-set. > = > > = > > Regards, > > -Denis > = > _______________________________________________ > ell mailing list > ell(a)lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/ell --===============3851919987225498872==--