All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>,
	 Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
	 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	 clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 boot options
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 14:15:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1561572949.5154.81.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190626121943.131390-2-glider@google.com>

On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 14:19 +0200, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> The new options are needed to prevent possible information leaks and
> make control-flow bugs that depend on uninitialized values more
> deterministic.
> 
> This is expected to be on-by-default on Android and Chrome OS. And it
> gives the opportunity for anyone else to use it under distros too via
> the boot args. (The init_on_free feature is regularly requested by
> folks where memory forensics is included in their threat models.)
> 
> init_on_alloc=1 makes the kernel initialize newly allocated pages and heap
> objects with zeroes. Initialization is done at allocation time at the
> places where checks for __GFP_ZERO are performed.
> 
> init_on_free=1 makes the kernel initialize freed pages and heap objects
> with zeroes upon their deletion. This helps to ensure sensitive data
> doesn't leak via use-after-free accesses.
> 
> Both init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 guarantee that the allocator
> returns zeroed memory. The two exceptions are slab caches with
> constructors and SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU flag. Those are never
> zero-initialized to preserve their semantics.
> 
> Both init_on_alloc and init_on_free default to zero, but those defaults
> can be overridden with CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON and
> CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON.
> 
> If either SLUB poisoning or page poisoning is enabled, we disable
> init_on_alloc and init_on_free so that initialization doesn't interfere
> with debugging.
> 
> Slowdown for the new features compared to init_on_free=0,
> init_on_alloc=0:
> 
> hackbench, init_on_free=1:  +7.62% sys time (st.err 0.74%)
> hackbench, init_on_alloc=1: +7.75% sys time (st.err 2.14%)
> 
> Linux build with -j12, init_on_free=1:  +8.38% wall time (st.err 0.39%)
> Linux build with -j12, init_on_free=1:  +24.42% sys time (st.err 0.52%)
> Linux build with -j12, init_on_alloc=1: -0.13% wall time (st.err 0.42%)
> Linux build with -j12, init_on_alloc=1: +0.57% sys time (st.err 0.40%)
> 
> The slowdown for init_on_free=0, init_on_alloc=0 compared to the
> baseline is within the standard error.
> 
> The new features are also going to pave the way for hardware memory
> tagging (e.g. arm64's MTE), which will require both on_alloc and on_free
> hooks to set the tags for heap objects. With MTE, tagging will have the
> same cost as memory initialization.
> 
> Although init_on_free is rather costly, there are paranoid use-cases where
> in-memory data lifetime is desired to be minimized. There are various
> arguments for/against the realism of the associated threat models, but
> given that we'll need the infrastructure for MTE anyway, and there are
> people who want wipe-on-free behavior no matter what the performance cost,
> it seems reasonable to include it in this series.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
> Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
> To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
> Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
> Cc: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
> Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> Cc: Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>
> Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Sandeep Patil <sspatil@android.com>
> Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
> Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
> Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> ---
>  v2:
>   - unconditionally initialize pages in kernel_init_free_pages()
>   - comment from Randy Dunlap: drop 'default false' lines from
> Kconfig.hardening
>  v3:
>   - don't call kernel_init_free_pages() from memblock_free_pages()
>   - adopted some Kees' comments for the patch description
>  v4:
>   - use NULL instead of 0 in slab_alloc_node() (found by kbuild test robot)
>   - don't write to NULL object in slab_alloc_node() (found by Android
>     testing)
>  v5:
>   - adjusted documentation wording as suggested by Kees
>   - disable SLAB_POISON if auto-initialization is on
>   - don't wipe RCU cache allocations made without __GFP_ZERO
>   - dropped SLOB support
>  v7:
>   - rebase the patch, added the Acked-by: tag
>  v8:
>   - addressed comments by Michal Hocko: revert kernel/kexec_core.c and
>     apply initialization in dma_pool_free()
>   - disable init_on_alloc/init_on_free if slab poisoning or page
>     poisoning are enabled, as requested by Qian Cai
>   - skip the redzone when initializing a freed heap object, as requested
>     by Qian Cai and Kees Cook
>   - use s->offset to address the freeptr (suggested by Kees Cook)
>   - updated the patch description, added Signed-off-by: tag
> ---
>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |  9 +++
>  drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_ioctl.c        |  2 +-
>  include/linux/mm.h                            | 22 ++++++
>  mm/dmapool.c                                  |  4 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c                               | 71 +++++++++++++++++--
>  mm/slab.c                                     | 16 ++++-
>  mm/slab.h                                     | 19 +++++
>  mm/slub.c                                     | 43 +++++++++--
>  net/core/sock.c                               |  2 +-
>  security/Kconfig.hardening                    | 29 ++++++++
>  10 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 138f6664b2e2..84ee1121a2b9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1673,6 +1673,15 @@
>  
>  	initrd=		[BOOT] Specify the location of the initial
> ramdisk
>  
> +	init_on_alloc=	[MM] Fill newly allocated pages and heap
> objects with
> +			zeroes.
> +			Format: 0 | 1
> +			Default set by CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON.
> +
> +	init_on_free=	[MM] Fill freed pages and heap objects with
> zeroes.
> +			Format: 0 | 1
> +			Default set by CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON.
> +
>  	init_pkru=	[x86] Specify the default memory protection keys
> rights
>  			register contents for all processes.  0x55555554 by
>  			default (disallow access to all but pkey 0).  Can
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_ioctl.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_ioctl.c
> index 829b0c6944d8..61758201d9b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/uverbs_ioctl.c
> @@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ __malloc void *_uverbs_alloc(struct uverbs_attr_bundle
> *bundle, size_t size,
>  	res = (void *)pbundle->internal_buffer + pbundle->internal_used;
>  	pbundle->internal_used =
>  		ALIGN(new_used, sizeof(*pbundle->internal_buffer));
> -	if (flags & __GFP_ZERO)
> +	if (want_init_on_alloc(flags))
>  		memset(res, 0, size);
>  	return res;
>  }
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index dd0b5f4e1e45..96be2604f313 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -2696,6 +2696,28 @@ static inline void kernel_poison_pages(struct page
> *page, int numpages,
>  					int enable) { }
>  #endif
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INIT_ON_ALLOC_DEFAULT_ON
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(init_on_alloc);
> +#else
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_on_alloc);
> +#endif
> +static inline bool want_init_on_alloc(gfp_t flags)
> +{
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_alloc))
> +		return true;
> +	return flags & __GFP_ZERO;
> +}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_INIT_ON_FREE_DEFAULT_ON
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_TRUE(init_on_free);
> +#else
> +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(init_on_free);
> +#endif
> +static inline bool want_init_on_free(void)
> +{
> +	return static_branch_unlikely(&init_on_free);
> +}
> +
>  extern bool _debug_pagealloc_enabled;
>  
>  static inline bool debug_pagealloc_enabled(void)

Do those really necessary need to be static keys?

Adding either init_on_free=0 or init_on_alloc=0 to the kernel cmdline will
generate a warning with kernels built with clang.

[    0.000000] static_key_disable(): static key 'init_on_free+0x0/0x4' used
before call to jump_label_init()
[    0.000000] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at ./include/linux/jump_label.h:317
early_init_on_free+0x1c0/0x200
[    0.000000] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 5.2.0-rc6-next-20190626+
#9
[    0.000000] pstate: 60000089 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO)
[    0.000000] pc : early_init_on_free+0x1c0/0x200
[    0.000000] lr : early_init_on_free+0x1c0/0x200
[    0.000000] sp : ffff100012c07df0
[    0.000000] x29: ffff100012c07e20 x28: ffff1000110a01ec 
[    0.000000] x27: 000000000000005f x26: ffff100011716cd0 
[    0.000000] x25: ffff100010d36166 x24: ffff100010d3615d 
[    0.000000] x23: ffff100010d364b5 x22: ffff1000117164a0 
[    0.000000] x21: 0000000000000000 x20: 0000000000000000 
[    0.000000] x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 000000000000002e 
[    0.000000] x17: 000000000000000f x16: 0000000000000040 
[    0.000000] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 6c61632065726f66 
[    0.000000] x13: 6562206465737520 x12: 273478302f307830 
[    0.000000] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 0000000000000000 
[    0.000000] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000 
[    0.000000] x7 : 6d756a206f74206c x6 : ffff100014426625 
[    0.000000] x5 : ffff100012c07b28 x4 : 0000000000000007 
[    0.000000] x3 : ffff1000101aadf4 x2 : 0000000000000001 
[    0.000000] x1 : 0000000000000001 x0 : 000000000000005d 
[    0.000000] Call trace:
[    0.000000]  early_init_on_free+0x1c0/0x200
[    0.000000]  do_early_param+0xd0/0x104
[    0.000000]  parse_args+0x1f0/0x524
[    0.000000]  parse_early_param+0x70/0x8c
[    0.000000]  setup_arch+0xa8/0x268
[    0.000000]  start_kernel+0x80/0x560


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-26 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-26 12:19 [PATCH v8 0/3] add init_on_alloc/init_on_free boot options Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v8 1/2] mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and init_on_free=1 " Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 14:49   ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-26 15:00     ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 15:42       ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-27 13:09         ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 18:15   ` Qian Cai [this message]
2019-06-26 20:23     ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27  6:15       ` Michal Hocko
2019-06-27 16:23         ` Kees Cook
2019-06-27  8:18     ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 23:28   ` Andrew Morton
2019-06-27 10:05     ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-27 13:17     ` Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 12:19 ` [PATCH v8 2/2] mm: init: report memory auto-initialization features at boot time Alexander Potapenko
2019-06-26 12:26 ` [PATCH v8 0/3] add init_on_alloc/init_on_free boot options Alexander Potapenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1561572949.5154.81.camel@lca.pw \
    --to=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=glider@google.com \
    --cc=jannh@google.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kcc@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=sspatil@android.com \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.