All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: mark pm function __maybe_unused
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 21:34:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1562765663.2597.16.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190708124743.3585020-1-arnd@arndb.de>

Hi, Arnd,

thanks for the report.

On 一, 2019-07-08 at 14:47 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Without CONFIG_PM, we get a harmless warning:
> 
> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c:446:
> 12: error: 'proc_thermal_resume' defined but not used [-
> Werror=unused-function]
>  static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> 
> Mark it __maybe_unused to shut up the warning.
> 
> Fixes: aaba9791fbb4 ("drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: Read PPCC
> on resume")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
>  .../thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c    | 2
> +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git
> a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> index a3210f09f366..5ce639a99330 100644
> ---
> a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> +++
> b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static void  proc_thermal_pci_remove(struct
> pci_dev *pdev)
>  	pci_disable_device(pdev);
>  }
>  
> -static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
> +static int __maybe_unused proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
>  {
>  	struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev;
>  
I'd rather prefer to add #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP for
proc_thermal_resume().
Just like the patch below, what do you think?

thanks,
rui

From 6c395f66e98c895cf3ebf87c0b2fc63b6a57a196 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2019 21:19:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] drivers: thermal: processor_thermal_device: Fix build warning

As a system sleep callback, proc_thermal_resume() should be defined only
if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set.

This fixes a build warning when CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not set,
drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c:446:12: error: 'proc_thermal_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
 static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)

Fixes: aaba9791fbb4 ("drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: Read PPCC on resume")
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
---
 drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
index a3210f0..77dae1e 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device.c
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ static void  proc_thermal_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	pci_disable_device(pdev);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
 static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct proc_thermal_device *proc_dev;
@@ -452,6 +453,9 @@ static int proc_thermal_resume(struct device *dev)
 
 	return 0;
 }
+#else
+#define proc_thermal_resume NULL
+#endif
 
 static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(proc_thermal_pm, NULL, proc_thermal_resume);
 
-- 
2.7.4


  reply	other threads:[~2019-07-10 13:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-08 12:47 [PATCH] drivers: thermal: processor_thermal: mark pm function __maybe_unused Arnd Bergmann
2019-07-10 13:34 ` Zhang Rui [this message]
2019-07-10 14:19   ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1562765663.2597.16.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.