From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: suzuki.poulose@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] coresight: etb10: Do not call smp_processor_id from" failed to apply to 4.19-stable tree
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 11:05:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <15629223562247@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.19-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 730766bae3280a25d40ea76a53dc6342e84e6513 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2019 16:12:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] coresight: etb10: Do not call smp_processor_id from
preemptible
During a perf session we try to allocate buffers on the "node" associated
with the CPU the event is bound to. If it is not bound to a CPU, we
use the current CPU node, using smp_processor_id(). However this is unsafe
in a pre-emptible context and could generate the splats as below :
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: perf/2544
Use NUMA_NO_NODE hint instead of using the current node for events
not bound to CPUs.
Fixes: 2997aa4063d97fdb39 ("coresight: etb10: implementing AUX API")
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.6+
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190620221237.3536-5-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
index d5b9edecf76e..3810290e6d07 100644
--- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
+++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etb10.c
@@ -374,12 +374,10 @@ static void *etb_alloc_buffer(struct coresight_device *csdev,
struct perf_event *event, void **pages,
int nr_pages, bool overwrite)
{
- int node, cpu = event->cpu;
+ int node;
struct cs_buffers *buf;
- if (cpu == -1)
- cpu = smp_processor_id();
- node = cpu_to_node(cpu);
+ node = (event->cpu == -1) ? NUMA_NO_NODE : cpu_to_node(event->cpu);
buf = kzalloc_node(sizeof(struct cs_buffers), GFP_KERNEL, node);
if (!buf)
reply other threads:[~2019-07-12 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=15629223562247@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.