From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@chromium.org>,
ilho215.lee@samsung.com, eunki_kim@samsung.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos: Add spinlocks to irq_mask and irq_unmask
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:03:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1563709.AX9HNR4mCI@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371058399-31933-1-git-send-email-dianders@chromium.org>
Hi Doug,
On Wednesday 12 of June 2013 10:33:17 Doug Anderson wrote:
> The patch:
> 1984695 pinctrl: samsung: Protect bank registers with a spinlock
>
> ...added spinlocks to protect many accesses. However, the irq_mask
> and irq_unmask functions still do an unprotected read/modify/write.
> Add the spinlock there.
Right, that's correct.
I always thought that the IRQ core already does some irqchip level
locking, but it seems like I got confused by irq_desc spinlock. Thanks for
spotting this.
Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Tomasz
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
> b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c index 2d76f66..c29a28e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
> @@ -56,10 +56,15 @@ static void exynos_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = bank->drvdata;
> unsigned long reg_mask = d->ctrl->geint_mask + bank->eint_offset;
> unsigned long mask;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> mask &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
> }
>
> static void exynos_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> @@ -68,10 +73,15 @@ static void exynos_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = bank->drvdata;
> unsigned long reg_mask = d->ctrl->geint_mask + bank->eint_offset;
> unsigned long mask;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> mask |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->slock, flags);
> }
>
> static void exynos_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
> @@ -264,10 +274,15 @@ static void exynos_wkup_irq_unmask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = b->drvdata;
> unsigned long reg_mask = d->ctrl->weint_mask + b->eint_offset;
> unsigned long mask;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&b->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> mask &= ~(1 << irqd->hwirq);
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->slock, flags);
> }
>
> static void exynos_wkup_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
> @@ -276,10 +291,15 @@ static void exynos_wkup_irq_mask(struct irq_data
> *irqd) struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *d = b->drvdata;
> unsigned long reg_mask = d->ctrl->weint_mask + b->eint_offset;
> unsigned long mask;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&b->slock, flags);
>
> mask = readl(d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> mask |= 1 << irqd->hwirq;
> writel(mask, d->virt_base + reg_mask);
> +
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&b->slock, flags);
> }
>
> static void exynos_wkup_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-13 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-12 17:33 [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos: Add spinlocks to irq_mask and irq_unmask Doug Anderson
2013-06-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: exynos: reorder xyz_irq_unmask() so future patch can ack Doug Anderson
2013-06-13 11:14 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 12:01 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-13 12:32 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-13 16:43 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: exynos: ack level-triggered interrupts before unmasking Doug Anderson
2013-06-13 10:54 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 16:34 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-13 16:40 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 12:04 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-13 16:38 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-13 16:42 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 16:50 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-13 23:13 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-14 0:00 ` Doug Anderson
2013-06-14 0:18 ` Kukjin Kim
2013-06-13 12:34 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-13 11:03 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-06-13 12:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: exynos: Add spinlocks to irq_mask and irq_unmask Kukjin Kim
2013-06-13 12:29 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-13 16:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] pinctrl: exynos: ack level-triggered interrupts before unmasking Doug Anderson
2013-06-13 16:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-06-13 18:20 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 16:56 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1563709.AX9HNR4mCI@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=eunki_kim@samsung.com \
--cc=ilho215.lee@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=semenzato@chromium.org \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.