All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: colyli@suse.de, axboe@kernel.dk, lkp@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] bcache: fix race in btree_flush_write()" failed to apply to 5.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 11:29:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <156387415937183@kroah.com> (raw)


The patch below does not apply to the 5.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

From 50a260e859964002dab162513a10f91ae9d3bcd3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2019 19:59:58 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] bcache: fix race in btree_flush_write()

There is a race between mca_reap(), btree_node_free() and journal code
btree_flush_write(), which results very rare and strange deadlock or
panic and are very hard to reproduce.

Let me explain how the race happens. In btree_flush_write() one btree
node with oldest journal pin is selected, then it is flushed to cache
device, the select-and-flush is a two steps operation. Between these two
steps, there are something may happen inside the race window,
- The selected btree node was reaped by mca_reap() and allocated to
  other requesters for other btree node.
- The slected btree node was selected, flushed and released by mca
  shrink callback bch_mca_scan().
When btree_flush_write() tries to flush the selected btree node, firstly
b->write_lock is held by mutex_lock(). If the race happens and the
memory of selected btree node is allocated to other btree node, if that
btree node's write_lock is held already, a deadlock very probably
happens here. A worse case is the memory of the selected btree node is
released, then all references to this btree node (e.g. b->write_lock)
will trigger NULL pointer deference panic.

This race was introduced in commit cafe56359144 ("bcache: A block layer
cache"), and enlarged by commit c4dc2497d50d ("bcache: fix high CPU
occupancy during journal"), which selected 128 btree nodes and flushed
them one-by-one in a quite long time period.

Such race is not easy to reproduce before. On a Lenovo SR650 server with
48 Xeon cores, and configure 1 NVMe SSD as cache device, a MD raid0
device assembled by 3 NVMe SSDs as backing device, this race can be
observed around every 10,000 times btree_flush_write() gets called. Both
deadlock and kernel panic all happened as aftermath of the race.

The idea of the fix is to add a btree flag BTREE_NODE_journal_flush. It
is set when selecting btree nodes, and cleared after btree nodes
flushed. Then when mca_reap() selects a btree node with this bit set,
this btree node will be skipped. Since mca_reap() only reaps btree node
without BTREE_NODE_journal_flush flag, such race is avoided.

Once corner case should be noticed, that is btree_node_free(). It might
be called in some error handling code path. For example the following
code piece from btree_split(),
        2149 err_free2:
        2150         bkey_put(b->c, &n2->key);
        2151         btree_node_free(n2);
        2152         rw_unlock(true, n2);
        2153 err_free1:
        2154         bkey_put(b->c, &n1->key);
        2155         btree_node_free(n1);
        2156         rw_unlock(true, n1);
At line 2151 and 2155, the btree node n2 and n1 are released without
mac_reap(), so BTREE_NODE_journal_flush also needs to be checked here.
If btree_node_free() is called directly in such error handling path,
and the selected btree node has BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit set, just
delay for 1 us and retry again. In this case this btree node won't
be skipped, just retry until the BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit cleared,
and free the btree node memory.

Fixes: cafe56359144 ("bcache: A block layer cache")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Reported-and-tested-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index 846306c3a887..ba434d9ac720 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
 #include <linux/rcupdate.h>
 #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
 #include <linux/rculist.h>
-
+#include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <trace/events/bcache.h>
 
 /*
@@ -659,12 +659,25 @@ static int mca_reap(struct btree *b, unsigned int min_order, bool flush)
 		up(&b->io_mutex);
 	}
 
+retry:
 	/*
 	 * BTREE_NODE_dirty might be cleared in btree_flush_btree() by
 	 * __bch_btree_node_write(). To avoid an extra flush, acquire
 	 * b->write_lock before checking BTREE_NODE_dirty bit.
 	 */
 	mutex_lock(&b->write_lock);
+	/*
+	 * If this btree node is selected in btree_flush_write() by journal
+	 * code, delay and retry until the node is flushed by journal code
+	 * and BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit cleared by btree_flush_write().
+	 */
+	if (btree_node_journal_flush(b)) {
+		pr_debug("bnode %p is flushing by journal, retry", b);
+		mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
+		udelay(1);
+		goto retry;
+	}
+
 	if (btree_node_dirty(b))
 		__bch_btree_node_write(b, &cl);
 	mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
@@ -1081,7 +1094,20 @@ static void btree_node_free(struct btree *b)
 
 	BUG_ON(b == b->c->root);
 
+retry:
 	mutex_lock(&b->write_lock);
+	/*
+	 * If the btree node is selected and flushing in btree_flush_write(),
+	 * delay and retry until the BTREE_NODE_journal_flush bit cleared,
+	 * then it is safe to free the btree node here. Otherwise this btree
+	 * node will be in race condition.
+	 */
+	if (btree_node_journal_flush(b)) {
+		mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
+		pr_debug("bnode %p journal_flush set, retry", b);
+		udelay(1);
+		goto retry;
+	}
 
 	if (btree_node_dirty(b)) {
 		btree_complete_write(b, btree_current_write(b));
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
index d1c72ef64edf..76cfd121a486 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.h
@@ -158,11 +158,13 @@ enum btree_flags {
 	BTREE_NODE_io_error,
 	BTREE_NODE_dirty,
 	BTREE_NODE_write_idx,
+	BTREE_NODE_journal_flush,
 };
 
 BTREE_FLAG(io_error);
 BTREE_FLAG(dirty);
 BTREE_FLAG(write_idx);
+BTREE_FLAG(journal_flush);
 
 static inline struct btree_write *btree_current_write(struct btree *b)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c b/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c
index 1218e3cada3c..a1e3e1fcea6e 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/journal.c
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@ static void btree_flush_write(struct cache_set *c)
 retry:
 	best = NULL;
 
+	mutex_lock(&c->bucket_lock);
 	for_each_cached_btree(b, c, i)
 		if (btree_current_write(b)->journal) {
 			if (!best)
@@ -442,15 +443,21 @@ static void btree_flush_write(struct cache_set *c)
 		}
 
 	b = best;
+	if (b)
+		set_btree_node_journal_flush(b);
+	mutex_unlock(&c->bucket_lock);
+
 	if (b) {
 		mutex_lock(&b->write_lock);
 		if (!btree_current_write(b)->journal) {
+			clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_journal_flush, &b->flags);
 			mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
 			/* We raced */
 			goto retry;
 		}
 
 		__bch_btree_node_write(b, NULL);
+		clear_bit(BTREE_NODE_journal_flush, &b->flags);
 		mutex_unlock(&b->write_lock);
 	}
 }


                 reply	other threads:[~2019-07-23  9:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=156387415937183@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=colyli@suse.de \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.