From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: julien.thierry@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
christoffer.dall@arm.com, james.morse@arm.com,
liwei391@huawei.com, marc.zyngier@arm.com, oleg@redhat.com,
rostedt@goodmis.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
yuzenghui@huawei.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking" failed to apply to 5.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2019 12:51:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1563879062242194@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.1-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From bd82d4bd21880b7c4d5f5756be435095d6ae07b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 10:38:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Fix incorrect irqflag restore for priority masking
When using IRQ priority masking to disable interrupts, in order to deal
with the PSR.I state, local_irq_save() would convert the I bit into a
PMR value (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF). This resulted in local_irq_restore()
potentially modifying the value of PMR in undesired location due to the
state of PSR.I upon flag saving [1].
In an attempt to solve this issue in a less hackish manner, introduce
a bit (GIC_PRIO_IGNORE_PMR) for the PMR values that can represent
whether PSR.I is being used to disable interrupts, in which case it
takes precedence of the status of interrupt masking via PMR.
GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is chosen such that (<pmr_value> |
GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET) does not mask more interrupts than <pmr_value> as
some sections (e.g. arch_cpu_idle(), interrupt acknowledge path)
requires PMR not to mask interrupts that could be signaled to the
CPU when using only PSR.I.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg716956.html
Fixes: 4a503217ce37 ("arm64: irqflags: Use ICC_PMR_EL1 for interrupt masking")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1.x-
Reported-by: Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Wei Li <liwei391@huawei.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Pouloze <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
index 14b41ddc68ba..9e991b628706 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_gicv3.h
@@ -163,7 +163,9 @@ static inline bool gic_prio_masking_enabled(void)
static inline void gic_pmr_mask_irqs(void)
{
- BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI < (GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF |
+ GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET));
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(GICD_INT_DEF_PRI >= GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
index db452aa9e651..f93204f319da 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/daifflags.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/irqflags.h>
+#include <asm/arch_gicv3.h>
#include <asm/cpufeature.h>
#define DAIF_PROCCTX 0
@@ -32,6 +33,11 @@ static inline void local_daif_mask(void)
:
:
: "memory");
+
+ /* Don't really care for a dsb here, we don't intend to enable IRQs */
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
+
trace_hardirqs_off();
}
@@ -43,7 +49,7 @@ static inline unsigned long local_daif_save(void)
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
/* If IRQs are masked with PMR, reflect it in the flags */
- if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) <= GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
+ if (read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1) != GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
flags |= PSR_I_BIT;
}
@@ -59,36 +65,44 @@ static inline void local_daif_restore(unsigned long flags)
if (!irq_disabled) {
trace_hardirqs_on();
- if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
- arch_local_irq_enable();
- } else if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
- /*
- * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
- * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
- */
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
- flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ dsb(sy);
+ }
+ } else if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
+ u64 pmr;
+
+ if (!(flags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
/*
- * There has been concern that the write to daif
- * might be reordered before this write to PMR.
- * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1
- * "Accessing PSTATE fields":
- * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on
- * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these
- * side-effects are guaranteed:
- * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in
- * the execution stream.
- * - To be visible to later instructions in the
- * execution stream
- *
- * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no
- * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled
- * to the PE after the write.
- *
- * So we don't need additional synchronization here.
+ * If interrupts are disabled but we can take
+ * asynchronous errors, we can take NMIs
*/
- arch_local_irq_disable();
+ flags &= ~PSR_I_BIT;
+ pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF;
+ } else {
+ pmr = GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET;
}
+
+ /*
+ * There has been concern that the write to daif
+ * might be reordered before this write to PMR.
+ * From the ARM ARM DDI 0487D.a, section D1.7.1
+ * "Accessing PSTATE fields":
+ * Writes to the PSTATE fields have side-effects on
+ * various aspects of the PE operation. All of these
+ * side-effects are guaranteed:
+ * - Not to be visible to earlier instructions in
+ * the execution stream.
+ * - To be visible to later instructions in the
+ * execution stream
+ *
+ * Also, writes to PMR are self-synchronizing, so no
+ * interrupts with a lower priority than PMR is signaled
+ * to the PE after the write.
+ *
+ * So we don't need additional synchronization here.
+ */
+ gic_write_pmr(pmr);
}
write_sysreg(flags, daif);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
index fbe1aba6ffb3..a1372722f12e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irqflags.h
@@ -67,43 +67,46 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_disable(void)
*/
static inline unsigned long arch_local_save_flags(void)
{
- unsigned long daif_bits;
unsigned long flags;
- daif_bits = read_sysreg(daif);
-
- /*
- * The asm is logically equivalent to:
- *
- * if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
- * flags = (daif_bits & PSR_I_BIT) ?
- * GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF :
- * read_sysreg_s(SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1);
- * else
- * flags = daif_bits;
- */
asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
- "mov %0, %1\n"
- "nop\n"
- "nop",
- __mrs_s("%0", SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1)
- "ands %1, %1, " __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
- "csel %0, %0, %2, eq",
- ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
- : "=&r" (flags), "+r" (daif_bits)
- : "r" ((unsigned long) GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF)
- : "cc", "memory");
+ "mrs %0, daif",
+ __mrs_s("%0", SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1),
+ ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+ : "=&r" (flags)
+ :
+ : "memory");
return flags;
}
+static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
+{
+ int res;
+
+ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
+ "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT),
+ "eor %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQON),
+ ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
+ : "=&r" (res)
+ : "r" ((int) flags)
+ : "memory");
+
+ return res;
+}
+
static inline unsigned long arch_local_irq_save(void)
{
unsigned long flags;
flags = arch_local_save_flags();
- arch_local_irq_disable();
+ /*
+ * There are too many states with IRQs disabled, just keep the current
+ * state if interrupts are already disabled/masked.
+ */
+ if (!arch_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))
+ arch_local_irq_disable();
return flags;
}
@@ -124,21 +127,5 @@ static inline void arch_local_irq_restore(unsigned long flags)
: "memory");
}
-static inline int arch_irqs_disabled_flags(unsigned long flags)
-{
- int res;
-
- asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE(
- "and %w0, %w1, #" __stringify(PSR_I_BIT) "\n"
- "nop",
- "cmp %w1, #" __stringify(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF) "\n"
- "cset %w0, ls",
- ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING)
- : "=&r" (res)
- : "r" ((int) flags)
- : "cc", "memory");
-
- return res;
-}
#endif
#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 4bcd9c1291d5..33410635b015 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -608,11 +608,12 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_enter(void)
* will not signal the CPU of interrupts of lower priority, and the
* only way to get out will be via guest exceptions.
* Naturally, we want to avoid this.
+ *
+ * local_daif_mask() already sets GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET, we just need a
+ * dsb to ensure the redistributor is forwards EL2 IRQs to the CPU.
*/
- if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking())
dsb(sy);
- }
}
static inline void kvm_arm_vhe_guest_exit(void)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
index b2de32939ada..da2242248466 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ptrace.h
@@ -35,9 +35,15 @@
* means masking more IRQs (or at least that the same IRQs remain masked).
*
* To mask interrupts, we clear the most significant bit of PMR.
+ *
+ * Some code sections either automatically switch back to PSR.I or explicitly
+ * require to not use priority masking. If bit GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET is included
+ * in the the priority mask, it indicates that PSR.I should be set and
+ * interrupt disabling temporarily does not rely on IRQ priorities.
*/
-#define GIC_PRIO_IRQON 0xf0
-#define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF (GIC_PRIO_IRQON & ~0x80)
+#define GIC_PRIO_IRQON 0xc0
+#define GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF (GIC_PRIO_IRQON & ~0x80)
+#define GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET (1 << 4)
/* Additional SPSR bits not exposed in the UABI */
#define PSR_IL_BIT (1 << 20)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
index 6d5966346710..165da78815c5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
@@ -258,6 +258,7 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
/*
* Registers that may be useful after this macro is invoked:
*
+ * x20 - ICC_PMR_EL1
* x21 - aborted SP
* x22 - aborted PC
* x23 - aborted PSTATE
@@ -449,6 +450,24 @@ alternative_endif
.endm
#endif
+ .macro gic_prio_kentry_setup, tmp:req
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
+ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
+ mov \tmp, #(GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET | GIC_PRIO_IRQON)
+ msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp
+ alternative_else_nop_endif
+#endif
+ .endm
+
+ .macro gic_prio_irq_setup, pmr:req, tmp:req
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
+ alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
+ orr \tmp, \pmr, #GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET
+ msr_s SYS_ICC_PMR_EL1, \tmp
+ alternative_else_nop_endif
+#endif
+ .endm
+
.text
/*
@@ -627,6 +646,7 @@ el1_dbg:
cmp x24, #ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 // if BRK64
cinc x24, x24, eq // set bit '0'
tbz x24, #0, el1_inv // EL1 only
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
mrs x0, far_el1
mov x2, sp // struct pt_regs
bl do_debug_exception
@@ -644,12 +664,10 @@ ENDPROC(el1_sync)
.align 6
el1_irq:
kernel_entry 1
+ gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x1
enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
-alternative_if ARM64_HAS_IRQ_PRIO_MASKING
- ldr x20, [sp, #S_PMR_SAVE]
-alternative_else_nop_endif
test_irqs_unmasked res=x0, pmr=x20
cbz x0, 1f
bl asm_nmi_enter
@@ -679,8 +697,9 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_PSEUDO_NMI
/*
- * if IRQs were disabled when we received the interrupt, we have an NMI
- * and we are not re-enabling interrupt upon eret. Skip tracing.
+ * When using IRQ priority masking, we can get spurious interrupts while
+ * PMR is set to GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF. An NMI might also have occurred in a
+ * section with interrupts disabled. Skip tracing in those cases.
*/
test_irqs_unmasked res=x0, pmr=x20
cbz x0, 1f
@@ -809,6 +828,7 @@ el0_ia:
* Instruction abort handling
*/
mrs x26, far_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x0
enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_off
@@ -854,6 +874,7 @@ el0_sp_pc:
* Stack or PC alignment exception handling
*/
mrs x26, far_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x0
enable_da_f
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_off
@@ -888,6 +909,7 @@ el0_dbg:
* Debug exception handling
*/
tbnz x24, #0, el0_inv // EL0 only
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
mrs x0, far_el1
mov x1, x25
mov x2, sp
@@ -909,7 +931,9 @@ ENDPROC(el0_sync)
el0_irq:
kernel_entry 0
el0_irq_naked:
+ gic_prio_irq_setup pmr=x20, tmp=x0
enable_da_f
+
#ifdef CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS
bl trace_hardirqs_off
#endif
@@ -931,6 +955,7 @@ ENDPROC(el0_irq)
el1_error:
kernel_entry 1
mrs x1, esr_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x2
enable_dbg
mov x0, sp
bl do_serror
@@ -941,6 +966,7 @@ el0_error:
kernel_entry 0
el0_error_naked:
mrs x1, esr_el1
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x2
enable_dbg
mov x0, sp
bl do_serror
@@ -965,6 +991,7 @@ work_pending:
*/
ret_to_user:
disable_daif
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x3
ldr x1, [tsk, #TSK_TI_FLAGS]
and x2, x1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK
cbnz x2, work_pending
@@ -981,6 +1008,7 @@ ENDPROC(ret_to_user)
*/
.align 6
el0_svc:
+ gic_prio_kentry_setup tmp=x1
mov x0, sp
bl el0_svc_handler
b ret_to_user
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
index 3767fb21a5b8..58efc3727778 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/process.c
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static void __cpu_do_idle_irqprio(void)
* be raised.
*/
pmr = gic_read_pmr();
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
__cpu_do_idle();
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
index bb4b3f07761a..4deaee3c2a33 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
@@ -192,11 +192,13 @@ static void init_gic_priority_masking(void)
WARN_ON(!(cpuflags & PSR_I_BIT));
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
-
/* We can only unmask PSR.I if we can take aborts */
- if (!(cpuflags & PSR_A_BIT))
+ if (!(cpuflags & PSR_A_BIT)) {
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQOFF);
write_sysreg(cpuflags & ~PSR_I_BIT, daif);
+ } else {
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
+ }
}
/*
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
index 8799e0c267d4..b89fcf0173b7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ int __hyp_text __kvm_vcpu_run_nvhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
* Naturally, we want to avoid this.
*/
if (system_uses_irq_prio_masking()) {
- gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON);
+ gic_write_pmr(GIC_PRIO_IRQON | GIC_PRIO_PSR_I_SET);
dsb(sy);
}
reply other threads:[~2019-07-23 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1563879062242194@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=julien.thierry@arm.com \
--cc=liwei391@huawei.com \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.