From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: briannorris@chromium.org, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
egranata@chromium.org, egranata@google.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, salvatore.bellizzi@linux.seppia.net,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: patch "driver core: platform: return -ENXIO for missing GpioInt" added to driver-core-linus
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 13:47:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <156448724115555@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
driver core: platform: return -ENXIO for missing GpioInt
to my driver-core git tree which can be found at
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/driver-core.git
in the driver-core-linus branch.
The patch will show up in the next release of the linux-next tree
(usually sometime within the next 24 hours during the week.)
The patch will hopefully also be merged in Linus's tree for the
next -rc kernel release.
If you have any questions about this process, please let me know.
From 46c42d844211ef5902e32aa507beac0817c585e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 13:49:54 -0700
Subject: driver core: platform: return -ENXIO for missing GpioInt
Commit daaef255dc96 ("driver: platform: Support parsing GpioInt 0 in
platform_get_irq()") broke the Embedded Controller driver on most LPC
Chromebooks (i.e., most x86 Chromebooks), because cros_ec_lpc expects
platform_get_irq() to return -ENXIO for non-existent IRQs.
Unfortunately, acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() doesn't follow this convention
and returns -ENOENT instead. So we get this error from cros_ec_lpc:
couldn't retrieve IRQ number (-2)
I see a variety of drivers that treat -ENXIO specially, so rather than
fix all of them, let's fix up the API to restore its previous behavior.
I reported this on v2 of this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190220180538.GA42642@google.com/
but apparently the patch had already been merged before v3 got sent out:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20190221193429.161300-1-egranata@chromium.org/
and the result is that the bug landed and remains unfixed.
I differ from the v3 patch by:
* allowing for ret==0, even though acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get() specifically
documents (and enforces) that 0 is not a valid return value (noted on
the v3 review)
* adding a small comment
Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reported-by: Salvatore Bellizzi <salvatore.bellizzi@linux.seppia.net>
Cc: Enrico Granata <egranata@chromium.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Fixes: daaef255dc96 ("driver: platform: Support parsing GpioInt 0 in platform_get_irq()")
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Enrico Granata <egranata@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190729204954.25510-1-briannorris@chromium.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/base/platform.c | 9 +++++++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/base/platform.c b/drivers/base/platform.c
index 506a0175a5a7..ec974ba9c0c4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/base/platform.c
@@ -157,8 +157,13 @@ int platform_get_irq(struct platform_device *dev, unsigned int num)
* the device will only expose one IRQ, and this fallback
* allows a common code path across either kind of resource.
*/
- if (num == 0 && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev))
- return acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev), num);
+ if (num == 0 && has_acpi_companion(&dev->dev)) {
+ int ret = acpi_dev_gpio_irq_get(ACPI_COMPANION(&dev->dev), num);
+
+ /* Our callers expect -ENXIO for missing IRQs. */
+ if (ret >= 0 || ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ return ret;
+ }
return -ENXIO;
#endif
--
2.22.0
reply other threads:[~2019-07-30 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=156448724115555@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=briannorris@chromium.org \
--cc=egranata@chromium.org \
--cc=egranata@google.com \
--cc=salvatore.bellizzi@linux.seppia.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.