All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,  linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>,
	Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't take the cpu_hotplug_lock
Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 14:54:04 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1569351244.5576.219.camel@lca.pw> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190924151147.GB23050@dhcp22.suse.cz>

On Tue, 2019-09-24 at 17:11 +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 24-09-19 11:03:21, Qian Cai wrote:
> [...]
> > While at it, it might be a good time to rethink the whole locking over there, as
> > it right now read files under /sys/kernel/slab/ could trigger a possible
> > deadlock anyway.
> > 
> 
> [...]
> > [  442.452090][ T5224] -> #0 (mem_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
> > [  442.459748][ T5224]        validate_chain+0xd10/0x2bcc
> > [  442.464883][ T5224]        __lock_acquire+0x7f4/0xb8c
> > [  442.469930][ T5224]        lock_acquire+0x31c/0x360
> > [  442.474803][ T5224]        get_online_mems+0x54/0x150
> > [  442.479850][ T5224]        show_slab_objects+0x94/0x3a8
> > [  442.485072][ T5224]        total_objects_show+0x28/0x34
> > [  442.490292][ T5224]        slab_attr_show+0x38/0x54
> > [  442.495166][ T5224]        sysfs_kf_seq_show+0x198/0x2d4
> > [  442.500473][ T5224]        kernfs_seq_show+0xa4/0xcc
> > [  442.505433][ T5224]        seq_read+0x30c/0x8a8
> > [  442.509958][ T5224]        kernfs_fop_read+0xa8/0x314
> > [  442.515007][ T5224]        __vfs_read+0x88/0x20c
> > [  442.519620][ T5224]        vfs_read+0xd8/0x10c
> > [  442.524060][ T5224]        ksys_read+0xb0/0x120
> > [  442.528586][ T5224]        __arm64_sys_read+0x54/0x88
> > [  442.533634][ T5224]        el0_svc_handler+0x170/0x240
> > [  442.538768][ T5224]        el0_svc+0x8/0xc
> 
> I believe the lock is not really needed here. We do not deallocated
> pgdat of a hotremoved node nor destroy the slab state because an
> existing slabs would prevent hotremove to continue in the first place.
> 
> There are likely details to be checked of course but the lock just seems
> bogus.

Check 03afc0e25f7f ("slab: get_online_mems for
kmem_cache_{create,destroy,shrink}"). It actually talk about the races during
memory as well cpu hotplug, so it might even that cpu_hotplug_lock removal is
problematic?


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-24 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-24 14:36 [PATCH v1] mm/memory_hotplug: Don't take the cpu_hotplug_lock David Hildenbrand
2019-09-24 14:48 ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-24 15:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-24 15:03 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-24 15:11   ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-24 18:54     ` Qian Cai [this message]
2019-09-25  7:02       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 16:01         ` Qian Cai
2019-09-25 17:48           ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-25 18:20             ` Qian Cai
2019-09-25 19:48               ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 20:32                 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-26  7:26                   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-26  7:38                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-26  7:26               ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-26 11:19                 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-26 11:52                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-26 13:02                     ` Qian Cai
2019-09-26 13:14                       ` David Hildenbrand
2019-09-25 10:03       ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-24 15:23   ` David Hildenbrand
2019-10-02 21:37 ` Qian Cai
2019-10-04  7:42   ` David Hildenbrand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1569351244.5576.219.camel@lca.pw \
    --to=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=osalvador@suse.de \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.