From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] drm/i915: Flush extra hard after writing relocations through" failed to apply to 5.3-stable tree
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 20:44:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <157056025210325@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.3-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 576f05865581f82ac988ffec70e4e2ebd31165db Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2019 12:21:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Flush extra hard after writing relocations through
the GTT
Recently discovered in commit bdae33b8b82b ("drm/i915: Use maximum write
flush for pwrite_gtt") was that we needed to our full write barrier
before changing the GGTT PTE to ensure that our indirect writes through
the GTT landed before the PTE changed (and the writes end up in a
different page). That also applies to our GGTT relocation path.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Prathap Kumar Valsan <prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190730112151.5633-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
index cbd7c6e3a1f8..4db4463089ce 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c
@@ -1014,11 +1014,12 @@ static void reloc_cache_reset(struct reloc_cache *cache)
kunmap_atomic(vaddr);
i915_gem_object_finish_access((struct drm_i915_gem_object *)cache->node.mm);
} else {
- wmb();
+ struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = cache_to_ggtt(cache);
+
+ intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __iomem *)vaddr);
- if (cache->node.allocated) {
- struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = cache_to_ggtt(cache);
+ if (cache->node.allocated) {
ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm,
cache->node.start,
cache->node.size);
@@ -1073,6 +1074,7 @@ static void *reloc_iomap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
void *vaddr;
if (cache->vaddr) {
+ intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
io_mapping_unmap_atomic((void __force __iomem *) unmask_page(cache->vaddr));
} else {
struct i915_vma *vma;
@@ -1114,7 +1116,6 @@ static void *reloc_iomap(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
offset = cache->node.start;
if (cache->node.allocated) {
- wmb();
ggtt->vm.insert_page(&ggtt->vm,
i915_gem_object_get_dma_address(obj, page),
offset, I915_CACHE_NONE, 0);
reply other threads:[~2019-10-08 18:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=157056025210325@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=prathap.kumar.valsan@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.