From: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
To: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, saipraka@codeaurora.org, agross@kernel.org
Cc: tsoni@codeaurora.org, sidgup@codeaurora.org,
psodagud@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
Subject: [RFC 09/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Improve SMC convention detection
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 12:40:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572378065-4490-10-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572378065-4490-1-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org>
- Use enum to describe SMC convention.
- Improve SMC convention detection to use __qcom_scm_is_call_available
instead of circumventing qcom_scm_call_smccc.
- Improve SMC convention detection to check that SMCCC-32 works, instead
of just assuming it does of SMCCC-64 does not.
Signed-off-by: Elliot Berman <eberman@codeaurora.org>
---
drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
index c83eb1d..4d7fd3e 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/qcom_scm-64.c
@@ -58,7 +58,13 @@ struct arm_smccc_args {
unsigned long a[8];
};
-static u64 qcom_smccc_convention = -1;
+enum qcom_smc_convention {
+ SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN,
+ SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32,
+ SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64,
+};
+
+static enum qcom_smc_convention qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(qcom_scm_lock);
#define QCOM_SCM_EBUSY_WAIT_MS 30
@@ -103,7 +109,9 @@ static int ___qcom_scm_call_smccc(struct device *dev,
smc.a[0] = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(
atomic ? ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL : ARM_SMCCC_STD_CALL,
- qcom_smccc_convention,
+ (qcom_smc_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64) ?
+ ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64 :
+ ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,
desc->owner,
SMCCC_FUNCNUM(desc->svc, desc->cmd));
smc.a[1] = desc->arginfo;
@@ -117,7 +125,7 @@ static int ___qcom_scm_call_smccc(struct device *dev,
if (!args_virt)
return -ENOMEM;
- if (qcom_smccc_convention == ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32) {
+ if (qcom_smc_convention == SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32) {
__le32 *args = args_virt;
for (i = 0; i < SMCCC_N_EXT_ARGS; i++)
@@ -579,19 +587,15 @@ int __qcom_scm_qsmmu500_wait_safe_toggle(struct device *dev, bool en)
void __qcom_scm_init(void)
{
- u64 cmd;
- struct arm_smccc_res res;
- u32 function = SMCCC_FUNCNUM(QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO, QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL);
-
/* First try a SMC64 call */
- cmd = ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL, ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,
- ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_SIP, function);
-
- arm_smccc_smc(cmd, QCOM_SCM_ARGS(1), cmd & (~BIT(ARM_SMCCC_TYPE_SHIFT)),
- 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, &res);
-
- if (!res.a0 && res.a1)
- qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64;
- else
- qcom_smccc_convention = ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32;
+ qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_64;
+ if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
+ QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) <= 0) {
+ /* Now try a SMC32 call */
+ qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_ARM_32;
+ if (__qcom_scm_is_call_available(NULL, QCOM_SCM_SVC_INFO,
+ QCOM_INFO_IS_CALL_AVAIL) <= 0) {
+ qcom_smc_convention = SMC_CONVENTION_UNKNOWN;
+ }
+ }
}
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-29 19:40 [RFC 00/17] Restructure, improve target support for qcom_scm driver Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 01/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Rename macros and structures Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 02/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Apply consistent naming scheme to command IDs Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 03/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Order functions, definitions by service/command Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 04/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Remove unused qcom_scm_get_version Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 05/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Move svc/cmd/owner into qcom_scm_desc Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 06/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Add SCM results to descriptor Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 07/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Remove qcom_scm_call_do_smccc Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 08/17] firmware: qcom_scm-64: Move SMC register filling to qcom_scm_call_smccc Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` Elliot Berman [this message]
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 10/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Use SMC arch wrappers Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:40 ` [RFC 11/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Use qcom_scm_desc in non-atomic calls Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 12/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Move SMCCC register filling to qcom_scm_call Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 13/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Create common legacy atomic call Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 14/17] firmware: qcom_scm-32: Add device argument to atomic calls Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 15/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Merge legacy and SMCCC conventions Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 16/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Enable legacy calling convention in qcom_scm-64.c Elliot Berman
2019-10-29 19:41 ` [RFC 17/17] firmware: qcom_scm: Rename -64 -> -smc, remove -32 Elliot Berman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1572378065-4490-10-git-send-email-eberman@codeaurora.org \
--to=eberman@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=psodagud@codeaurora.org \
--cc=saipraka@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sidgup@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tsoni@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.