From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Stein Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] pinctrl: baytrail: Add missing spinlock usage in byt_gpio_irq_handler Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2017 08:47:05 +0100 Message-ID: <1572471.RPgeE8YS6g@ws-stein> References: <20170130113528.17838-1-alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> <20170130115149.GM17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from webbox1416.server-home.net ([77.236.96.61]:40385 "EHLO webbox1416.server-home.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751292AbdBAHrN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2017 02:47:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170130115149.GM17297@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: Heikki Krogerus , Linus Walleij , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Monday 30 January 2017 13:51:49, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:35:28PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote: > > According to VLI64 Intel Atom E3800 Specification Update (#329901) > > concurrent read accesses may result in returning 0xffffffff and write > > accesses may be dropped silently. > > To workaround all accesses must be protected by locks. > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg > > Should probably go to stable as well. Sure, but I don't know which stable kernels this should go in. Best regards, Alexander